Shareholder Agreement Template

Please keep in mind that this is not legal advice. The information provided herein is for educational purposes only. If you would like to get in touch with a lawyer to help you draft, interpret, negotiate or resolve a dispute about a shareholders agreement or unanimous shareholder agreement, then you are encouraged to seek a professional (e.g. make a post on Dynamic Lawyers). We have Ontario lawyers who can assist you in this regard (I would know, I’m one of them!). If you want to get in touch with me directly, feel free to email me directly to discuss all your shareholder agreements needs!

So this is a follow up to my recent post about Shareholder Agreements in Ontario. In this blog, I’ll be talking about some of the nuances of a typical shareholders agreement.

Shares, Shareholders, and Shareholders Agreements
So lets start off with the basics, shall we? Corporations are separate legal persons. They are separate from their owners (called shareholders) and managers (typically, the officers, directors, and employees). They have their own rights, duties, etc.

Now, whoever owns the shares of the corporation owns the corporation. These persons – who can be individuals, corporations, partnerships, etc. – are called shareholders. There may be different types of shareholders, depending on how the corporation was initially structured. For example, if the corporation wanted SOME people to control it, then those people would have VOTING shares. Other people who owned part of the corporation but did not have control over it would have NON-VOTING shares. The VOTING shares are used at shareholder meetings to vote in a board of directors (who appoint the officers) to manage the corporation. Those with NON-VOTING shares don’t get to vote anyone in. If you want to know more about the rights, privileges, conditions, etc. of shares, you can skim through my other blogs about corporate shares here and classes and series of shares here.

Now, upon dissolution, the assets of the corporation will be liquidated and paid out to creditors and shareholders. Certain shareholders may have priority over other shareholders.

There may also be restrictions on a shareholder’s ability to transfer the shares. For example, the consent of the board of directors or the shareholders may be required to do so. There may be other kinds of restrictions or obligations you want to attach to the shares. These things (among other things) can be taken care of through a SHAREHOLDERS AGREEMENT.

When are they used?
Shareholders Agreements are typically used when parties are either first starting a company and want to outline their respective rights, privileges, duties, etc. or when parties are admitting new shareholders to the corporation. The latter is typically the case when venture capitalists (financiers) want to help get the corporation’s business up and running. The purpose of the shareholders’ agreement is to govern the relationship between the shareholders. Without one, there can be many disputes that arise and which get resolved in a costly and time consuming manner: namely, court! So having certainty over many of the important issues found in a shareholders agreement CAN actually help to avoid or mitigate future disputes since everyone will (or at least “should”) know what they’re getting into.

They are private and comprehensive
Remember: a shareholders agreement is generally a private agreement which is not in the public realm (unless it is disclosed as part of a lawsuit). This can be contrasted with the articles of incorporation (the document which creates the corporation) which is available to the public and which may also deal with certain things that the shareholders agreement deals with (e.g. restrictions on share transfer) but which is not as comprehensive. Therefore, for the sake of confidentiality and comprehensiveness, it is recommended to have a shareholders agreement and not simply rely on articles of incorporation!

Shareholders Agreement Typical Structure
So what can a typical shareholders agreement deal with? Well, a typical shareholders agreement can deal with things like:

1. Control and Management
2. Transferring Shares
3. Valuing Shares
4. Non-Compete and Non-Solicitation
5. Confidentiality
6. Resolving Disputes
7. General Terms

I’ve previously blogged about these things, so I would encourage you to keep reading to educate yourself!

Additional Resources to Learn About Shareholders:

1. Online School – Learn about shareholders and corporations in legal and business classes.
2. Shareholders – Definition

written by admin \\ tags: ontario unanimous shareholder agreement template, shareholder agreement, shareholder agreement template, shareholders, shareholders agreements, unanimous shareholder agreement template

Canada | Canadian not for profit incorporation.

Please note that the information provided herein is not legal advice and is provided for informational and educational purposes only. If you need legal advice with respect to incorporating a federal not for profit corporation or an Ontario not for profit corporation, you should seek professional assistance (e.g. make a post on Dynamic Lawyers). We have Toronto, Ottawa, Hamilton, Brampton, Mississauga and other Ontario lawyers registered to help you. You can also contact me directly if you need a business lawyer.

For the purposes of this blog, I’ll be discussing federal not for profit corporations.  These corporations are created and governed by the Canada Corporations Act.  That Act does not call them not for profit corporations; rather they are called “Corporations Without Share Capital”.  This means that they do not have shareholders, but rather members.  An important difference between for profit and not for profit corporations is that the latter cannot distribute dividends (from profits) to members.  Rather, that money can only be put towards the objects or purposes for which the not for profit corporation was created.

For Profit Corporations (Generally)
Now, I’ve previously blogged extensively about corporations generally, but some things are worth repeating here.  First, corporations are separate legal persons.  They have their own assets.  They have their own rights and obligations.  They can sue and be sued.  They are separate from their owners (called shareholders) and managers (directors, officers, employees).  Now, corporations are great business vehicles because they afford limited liability protection to the shareholders: the personal assets of the shareholders cannot generally be touched if the corporation has to pay for something.  The corporation is created by legislation through the filing of Articles of Incorporation.  You should check out my previous blog posts about corporations, shares, articles, roles and responsibilities, etc.

Canadian Not-For-Profit Corporation
Part II of the Act deals with Corporations Without Share Capital.  Section 154(1) of the Act says that the Minister of Industry MAY issue letters patent to any persons who apply for the creation of a corporation without share capital.  There are a few important caveats here.  First, there must always be at least 3 incorporators and directors of the not for profit corporation.  Second, the letters patent is simply a government document – much like the Articles of Incorporation of a for-profit business.  Third, the corporation must carry on a purpose without monetary gain to its members.  So it must have a purpose that is national, patriotic, religious, philanthropic, charitable, scientific, artistic, social, professional, or sporting in nature.

Application of Letters Patent
To apply for letters patent, you need to submit:

1. Cover Letter
2. Application
3. By-Laws
4. Statutory Declaration
5. Filing fee of $200

Each will be discussed in turn.

Cover Letter
The cover letter should be addressed to:

Corporations Canada
Industry Canada
9th Floor, Jean Edmonds Towers South
365 Laurier Avenue West
Ottawa, Ontario, K1A 0C8

The letter should indicate who you are, what your contact information is and what documents are enclosed.  You will also need to enclose a cheque in the amount of $200 payable to the “Receiver General of Canada”.  If you are requesting them to do a NUANS name search report, then you’ll also need to enclose or add another $15 to cover the cost of that search.

Application
The application must indicate:

• The proposed name of the not for profit corporation (so you’ll need to provide a recent NUANS name search report for the proposed name which is less than 90 days old – or you can simply pay $15 and get the government to do it for you)
• Who the incorporators are (there must be at least 3 of them)
• The objects of the corporation

There are also additional clauses which can be included in the letters patent dealing with the director’s ability to borrow money, issue debt, and pass by laws as the directors see fit.

The application must be signed in duplicate and the originals are to sent to the government.

The By-Laws
Two copies of the by-laws of the proposed corporation must be provided with the application for incorporation. If you need help drafting these by-laws, give me a shout.

Statutory Declaration
One of the incorporators must swear (before a commissioner for taking oaths) that the contents of the application are true.

Processing Time
Processing times vary, depending on whether you’ve provided the government will all required documentation and there are no problems with your proposed name.  It can be as quick as 3 days for expedited processing, or 5 days for standard processing.

Extra-Provincial Licensing
If you have a federal not for profit corporation, you’ll need to obtain provincial licenses for those provinces which you operate in.  If you operate in Ontario, then there is no fee.  But this varies from one province to the next (e.g. Alberta charges $175 for an extra provincial license).

In a future blog, I’ll get into maintenance fees and taxes with respect to federal not for profit corporations (i.e. corporations without share capital).

For more information about incorporating a not for profit corporation in Canada, check out the government’s website here.

written by admin \\ tags: articles of incorporation, business lawyer, business vehicles, canada corporations act, educational purposes, legal advice, legal persons, liability protection, limited liability, ontario lawyers, professional assistance, profit corporation, profit corporations, share capital, shareholders

Please note that the information provided herein is not legal advice and is provided for informational and educational purposes only.  If you need legal advice with respect to forming a Delaware LLC, you should seek professional assistance.  If you would like me to coordinate with U.S. counsel to form a Delaware LLC for you, you can contact me directly.

So why am I, an Ontario lawyer, talking about Delaware LLCs in this blog?  Well, for the simple reason that Canadians often use Delaware and other state LLCs as part of structuring their business.  LLCs are interesting business structures with definite advantages that should be explored.  So that’s why I’m devoting this blog to talking about them generally.  Now lets start off with the basics, shall we?

LLC?
LLC stands for “Limited Liability Company”.  A Delaware LLC is a Limited Liability Company that is formed and governed in the good state of Delaware under the Limited Liability Company Act.  That Act was enacted in 1992.

Why is an LLC so special?
An LLC is a hybrid entity: part partnership, part corporation.  It takes the best and worse of both worlds.  As a partnership, it can be disregarded for tax purposes.  This means it’s a flow through entity.  So the members (not shareholders) who own the units of the LLC receive the profits and losses and are taxed accordingly.  This differs from a corporation, where the corporation is a separate legal entity (it gets taxed) and then the shareholders receive dividends (they get taxed again!).  So, as a partnership-like structure, it has tax advantages.

But it also conveys limited liability status on its members and managers: the Act provides that, unless an operating agreement of the LLC says otherwise, the members and managers of the LLC have limited liability to 3rd parties for the debts and obligations of the LLC:

§ 18-303. Liability to 3rd parties.

(a) Except as otherwise provided by this chapter, the debts, obligations and liabilities of a limited liability company, whether arising in contract, tort or otherwise, shall be solely the debts, obligations and liabilities of the limited liability company, and no member or manager of a limited liability company shall be obligated personally for any such debt, obligation or liability of the limited liability company solely by reason of being a member or acting as a manager of the limited liability company.

(b) Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (a) of this section, under a limited liability company agreement or under another agreement, a member or manager may agree to be obligated personally for any or all of the debts, obligations and liabilities of the limited liability company.

Operating Agreement
Unless the LLC has an operating agreement that says otherwise, the LLC is governed by the Act.  The Act has various default rules.  This is akin to an Ontario partnership.  It will cover things such as:

• Formation and Purpose
• Term
• Capital Contributions
• Allocations and Distributions
• Company Interests (transfer, redemptions, etc.)
• Members (e.g. admission, removal, resignation)
• Managers
• Administrative Matters (e.g. accounting, tax, etc.)
• Termination and Dissolution
• General Matters

Ease of Creation
Delaware LLCs are easily formed.  They are not incorporated (because they are not corporations), but “formed”.  The Certificate of Formation must be filed, a registered office and agent in Delaware is required, and an Operating Agreement must be entered into (either oral or written).  Interestingly, the government provides a lot of flexibility with what people are required to do to maintain Delaware LLCs: there is no obligation to maintain books and records in Delaware, nor is the LLC required to do business in Delaware!

Costs
Filing a Delaware LLC can cost between USD$200-$600, depending on who does it and what you get (e.g. By-Laws, Unit Certificates, Seal, Minute Book, Operating Agreement, etc.). Part of that cost involves paying a $99 fee to have a registered agent who can accept service of documents (e.g. lawsuits) on behalf of the LLC.  You must also pay a $250 State franchise tax annually.  Operating agreements may cost anywhere from a few hundred to a few thousand dollars, depending on how complicated they are (think: more parties means longer to draft, review, and negotiate = increased costs!).  Finally, for those parties who want to have a manager of the LLC other than themselves, there are service providers who will do that.

So that’s it for now about Delaware LLCs…remember: if you need an Ontario lawyer to help you coordinate with U.S. counsel to form a Delaware LLC as part of your business structure, you can contact me directly.

written by admin \\ tags: both worlds, business structures, canadians, debts, definite advantages, dividends, educational purposes, legal advice, liabilities, liability company act, limited liability company, limited liability company act, llcs, ontario lawyer, operating agreement, professional assistance, separate legal entity, shareholders, state of delaware, tax purposes

Please note that the information provided herein is not legal advice and is provided for informational and educational purposes only. If you need legal advice with respect to incorporating (e.g. registering articles of incorporation, drafting by-laws, director / shareholder resolutions, registries), you should seek professional assistance (e.g. make a post on Dynamic Lawyers). We have Toronto, Ottawa, Hamilton, Brampton, Mississauga and other Ontario lawyers registered to help you. You can also contact me directly (I am a Toronto business lawyer).

In this blog, I’m going to be talking about Ontario corporate shares and what it means when someone says they are authorized, issued and outstanding.

Authorized and Issued
So when a corporation is created through the filing of articles of incorporation, you will need to indicate the limit (if there is one) on the number and type of shares.  For example, do you only want the corporation to be AUTHORIZED or permitted to issue (i.e. give to a person in exchange for receiving money, property, or past services rendered) only 100 shares?  Once these 100 shares are then issued, the corporation will not be able to issue any more unless the articles are amended to authorize the corporation to issue more shares.  Get it?

So if the parties want to try to limit the VALUE of the corporation, they will limit the number of shares which the corporation is authorized to issue.  This way, the directors of the corporation (who are elected by the shareholders entitled to vote) cannot issue additional shares and dilute existing shareholders. This is only done in situations where all the shareholders are content with the value of the company and don’t need to seek external financing.  If they want external financing, they will make the corporation authorized to issue an UNLIMITED number of shares.

Outstanding
Once the corporation issues shares, it generally collects money or property.  The value of what it receives is recorded and called the paid up capital (in tax terms) or stated capital (in corporate or accounting terms).  Now, when it does issue corporate shares, it records the number and type (class, series) of share that is outstanding.  This is another way for the corporation to keep track of who owns what and how much they paid for it.  Remember: the value of the shares may not be adequately reflected in the paid up capital or stated capital.  This is just the amount of money that was paid at one point in time to the corporation in exchange for getting shares issued at that time.  The fair market value of the shares may be based on future prospects, intangible assets, etc.

written by admin \\ tags: articles of incorporation, brampton, business lawyer, corporate shares, legal advice, mississauga, money property, ontario lawyers, ottawa, professional assistance, shareholder resolutions, shareholders, toronto business

Please note that the information provided herein is not legal advice and is provided for informational and educational purposes only.  If you need legal advice with respect to drafting, reviewing, interpreting or resolving disputes concerning partnership and limited partnership agreements, you should seek professional assistance (e.g. make a post on Dynamic Lawyers).  We have Toronto, Ottawa, Hamilton, Mississauga, Brampton, and other Ontario business lawyers registered on the website who can answer your questions or help you with your partnership and limited partnership agreements.  I should know – I’m one of them and you can contact me directly.

Following up on my recent blogs about Ontario limited partnerships, what they’re all about, how a limited partner can lose their limited partner status, and how a limited partnership is not a separate legal person, I thought I would blog about an important yet often overlooked aspect of using limited partnerships to raise money for an investment: complying with securities laws.

Ontario limited partnerships are generally used for tax planning purposes.  A group of persons want to start a business.  They realize that the business will generate losses in the first few years (which is normal when you’re first starting out).  They want to offset their income with those losses.  If they use a corporation, the losses will get trapped in the corporation.  The corporation can carry them forward (to a certain extent), but cannot transfer those losses through dividends to the shareholders.  Since a limited partnership is simply a flow-through structure and not a separate legal entity, its losses can be attributed to its partners.  So, to recap: Ontario limited partnerships are generally used for tax purposes (since they offer no advantages to mitigate liability vis-a-vis a corporation).

Now, we move on to securities laws implications.

When limited partnerships are being established, it’s not just a matter of complying with the provincial partnerships acts, the Income Tax Act, and any partnership agreement that may exist between the partners.  If the limited partnership is going to be offering “securities” (as defined under the Ontario Securities Act) through the offering of limited partnership interests that fall under that definition, then the limited partnership will need to comply with dealer registration, prospectus requirements, and other onerous obligations before it is allowed to offer those securities.  The limited partnership can, however, avoid complying with those securities law obligations if it qualifies for an exemption.  You should definitely consult with a business lawyer familiar with these exemptions BEFORE offering limited partnership interests. Also keep in mind that you’ll need to comply in ALL of the jurisdictions you’re proposing to offer securities.  So you’ll need to consult with lawyers about compliance in those jurisdictions (and the rules are not necessarily the same wherever you go!).  All too often, parties don’t think about complying with securities laws until it’s too late.  Then it’s only down hill from there: Ontario Securities Act proceedings which could result in worse things (e.g. civil litigation, bankruptcy, divorce, etc.).  OUCH!!!

written by admin \\ tags: business lawyers, educational purposes, first few years, legal advice, limited partnership agreements, limited partnerships, ontario business, partner status, professional assistance, securities laws, separate legal entity, shareholders, tax planning, tax purposes

Please keep in mind that this is not legal advice.  The information provided herein is for educational purposes only. If you would like to get in touch with a lawyer to help you draft, interpret, negotiate or resolve a dispute about a joint venture, then you are encouraged to seek a professional (e.g. make a post on Dynamic Lawyers).  We have Toronto and Ottawa lawyers who can assist you in this regard (I would know, I’m one of them!).

So this blog will deal with the basics of a joint venture agreement or contract.  In other blogs, I’ll get down to the nitty gritty.

Definition
Plaint and simple, a joint venture is a contract between two or more parties to share resources, knowledge, skills, etc. towards a common objective.

Parties
As usual in these types of agreements, the parties are identified at the get-go (make sure this is done properly or else your contract won’t be worth the paper it’s written on!).

Recitals
This is the background story you want to tell that leads up to the formation of the joint venture.  It could go something like: Party X does Y and has Z.  Party A does B and has C.  The two would now like to join forces to make even more $$$.  So they’re agreeing to have a joint venture in accordance with the terms and conditions set out in the joint venture agreement or contract…

Definitions
It’s a good idea to set out the definitions you’re going to be relying upon near the top of the joint venture agreement (for ease of reference and good organization).  You could include definitions here about “Confidential Information” (assuming there will be confidential information passed between the parties as a result of the joint venture), what constitutes “Force Majeure” (e.g. act of God that relieves a party of liability under the agreement in certain circumstances), etc.

Business Structure
The joint venture agreement or contract will generally state how the joint venture is structured.  Is it simply two separate entities acting in concert through the joint venture agreement or contract?  Will there be a new corporation formed?  Will there be a partnership formed?  Will that partnership be a general or limited liability partnership?  For more discussion about the general forms of business one can structure in Ontario, check out this free information about business structures we’ve been accumulating.

Nature of the Relationship
So will the joint venturers be partners (capable of binding each other), corporate shareholders, or simply joint venturers (i.e. their rights and obligations are limited to the terms of the joint venture agreement or contract).

Term and Termination
How long will the joint venture last for and what events give rise to its premature termination?  Will the parties simply be able to give each other notice?  Will the joint venture dissolve by operation of law, by one party filing for bankruptcy, by one party attempting to illegally assign their interest in the joint venture to a third party, etc.?  Again, you should consult with a lawyer to find out what kinds of things typically go in this section.  Also important is what to do in the even of default.  Does one of the joint venturers become liable to pay the other if they are at fault?  Who determines fault and according to what test (e.g. sole and absolute discretion)?  There’s a lot to think about here…

Joint Venture Assets and Benefits
How will these things be deal with?  Will there be a percentage of ownership?  Will the benefits be based on revenues or profits?  Can these interests be assigned?

Operations
How will the joint venture be operated on a day-to-day basis?  Will the joint venture committee have the power to enter contracts on behalf of the joint venture?  Perhaps the joint venture committee will create a new corporation to take on a certain responsibilities and simply own equally the shares of the new corporation.  That new corporation would operate as a separate business, but its shareholders would be the joint venturers (who would elect the directors, who in turn would appoint the day-to-day officers).  This would be a good place to put reporting and record-keeping requirements too.

Joint Venture Responsibilities
Here, we get to the nitty gritty of who will be responsible for what in the joint venture. Separate paragraphs will be needed for each of the parties.

Joint Venture Management
Will there be a committee?  Will representatives from each of the parties be on the commitee?  Will there be a chairperson?  How will meetings be managed, votes and decision made?  Will there be direction from owners and delegation to the committee?  In my opinion, and as I’ve previously blogged about, businesses should be run as dictatorships with consultants, not as democracies (too many voices means things won’t get done).  

Representations and Warranties
What kinds of true, fair, and complete statements must the parties make to induce the other parties to enter the agreement?  The parties want to know that their joint venturer partners have the authorization and operational wherewithall to do what it is they are about to do.  If these representations and warranties no longer hold true, then what’s the consequence?  Notice?  Termination?  This should be spelled out here…

Liability and Indemnification
Will the joint venturers try to limit their liability from each other in connection with the joint venture?  Will they indemnify each other for their own wrongdoing – whether in contract, tort, negligence, misconduct, breach of statute or otherwise?

General Terms and Conditions
This section of the Joint Venture Agreement will deal with things like (which I’ve previously touched on in teh context of an independent contractor agreement):

• Notices
• Entire Agreement
• Governing Law
• Interpretation
• Assignment
• Waiver
• Cumulative Remedies
• Counterparts
• Enurement
• Entire Agreement
• Time of Essence
• Independent Legal Advice
• Force Majeure
• Severability
• Survival
• Currency

written by admin \\ tags: agreement, assets, bankruptcies, bankruptcy, blog, breach, business, circumstances, confidentiality, contracts, corporation, indemnification, lawyer, lawyers, liabilities, negligence, negotiating, Negotiations, partnership, percentages, relationships, separation, shareholder, shareholders, shareholdings, toronto

Please note that the information provided herein is not legal advice and is provided for informational and educational purposes only.  If you need legal advice with respect to creating a limited liability company or amending a corporation’s articles of incorporation, you should seek professional assistance (e.g. make a post on Dynamic Lawyers).  We have Toronto and Ottawa business lawyers registered on the website who can answer your questions or help you with your  Ontario or Federal corporations.

As a follow up to my recent post about income-splitting shares, I neglected to mention one of the biggest benefits of using income splitting preference shares: income splitting to reduce reduce household taxes.

Take the following example.  You have a corporation.  It earns $300,000 in taxable income.  Because of the small business credit (which I will be discussing in a future blog post), the corporation only pays 16.5% tax on that amount (this rate is going down to 15.5% starting July 1, 2010).  What do you do with the after-tax dollars?  Well, you could either keep it in the company and let it accumulate or you could dividend it out.  The latter is where the income-splitting shares come into play.  You can simply give these shares to members of your family who have little or no income.  Then, when the corporation’s directors (e.g. you) declares a dividend to the shareholders of this class of shares, they will receive and have to pay tax on those dividends.  They will get the benefit of the dividend tax credit.  But the beautiful thing is that less taxes end up being paid than if someone (e.g. you) had a higher income and received the same dividends (because of how our marginal taxes work).  These shares are not susceptible to the attribution rules found in the Canada Income Tax Act.

Remember, if you need help structuring your corporation to create income-splitting preference shares, you should make a post on Dynamic Lawyers.

written by admin \\ tags: articles of incorporation, business, canada, Canada Income Tax, canadian income tax, canadian income taxation, corporation, declarations, dividend, dividend tax credit, income tax act, incorporation, lawyers, shareholder, shareholders

So what’s the difference between a shareholder, director, and officer in a limited liability corporation?  People often confuse directors and officers or believe that shareholders must also be a director and/or officer.  I’m going to spell it out here to dismiss all the confusion about these three parties by talking about their respective roles and responsibilities.

Shareholder
Shareholders own the corporation through their share ownership.  They have the right to attend and vote at meetings (assuming they have voting shares).  This often happens on an annual basis, but can happen sooner if they want to change the board of directors they elected.  Their role is that of hands-off manager: they delegate their decision-making powers to the board of directors they elect.  Shareholders aren’t totally out of the decision-making picture, however.  Shareholder must approve by-laws (i.e. power-giving documents which authorize corporate action) and vote on important matters concerning the corporation’s Articles of Incorporation (e.g. issuance of shares, new share class, restrictions on share transfers, restrictions on business, changing the corporation’s name, etc.).  But generally, shareholder do not participate int eh day-to0day operations unless they are also officers and/or directors.  However: there is no requirement that they be officers and/or directors.

Directors
Directors are elected by the shareholders.  The articles of incorporation specify the maximum and minimum number of directors there can be and the by-laws generally have provisions in place for things like director vacancies (e.g. by death, resignation, etc.).  Directors meet every so often to decide on long-term strategy and evaluate the progress of the corporation.  They themselves delegate decision-making on a daily or more routine basis to the officers of the corporation.  Directors are responsible for declaring and paying out dividends to shareholders and get involved in important corporate matters.

Officer
Officers are those individuals who manage the day to day affairs of the corporation.  They have titles like CEO, President, Treasurer, Vice-President, CFO, Secretary, etc. but these are just titles and there’s no formal requirement that they have a particular title.  The duties and responsibilities of the officers are generally spelled out in the corporate by-laws and more specifically spelled out in an employment contract.

written by admin \\ tags: articles of incorporation, board of directors, corporate matters, corporation directors, limited liability corporation, roles and responsibilities, shareholder, shareholders

Please note that the information provided herein is not legal advice and is provided for informational and educational purposes only.  If you need legal advice with respect to creating a limited liability company or amending a corporation’s articles of incorporation, you should seek professional assistance (e.g. make a post on Dynamic Lawyers).  We have Toronto and Ottawa business lawyers registered on the website who can answer your questions or help you with your  Ontario or Federal corporations.

Sure, you’ve heard it before: corporations typically have Class A shares (or common voting shares) and Class B shares (or preferred non-voting shares).  But have you heard of Class C shares which are designed specifically for income-splitting?  The reality is that, so long as you have one type of common voting share, you can be quite innovative with the characteristics you assign to other classes of shares.

So lets get into nitty gritty of what I mean byClass C “income-splitting” shares.  Basically, these are a class of shares that are subservient to Class A and Class B shares in virtually all regards. Specifically, you can design Class C shares such that they:

• have no voting rights;
• have no voting rights or right to dissent with respect to issues revolving around shares, classes of shares, cancellation of shares, issuance of shares, etc.;
• have a right to receive a non-cumulative dividend (as determined and declared by the board of directors from time to time);
• be redeemable by the corporation for a pre-determined price (e.g. $1.00);
• be redeemable by the corporation upon liquidation, dissolution, or winding up for a pre-determined price (e.g. $1.00 each);
• be denied entitlement to any additional profit above and beyond what was declared by the board (which would go to Class A and/or Class B shareholders)

So what’s the purpose of having such a subservient class of shares subect to the rights and entitlements of Class A and Class B shares?  Simple: keep corporate control out of these shareholders’ hands while giving them compensation in the form of dividends from time to time .  These class of shares can be redeemed (which means cancelled) for a pre-determined “redemption amount”.  Overall, this class of share seems good for a silent investor who is comfortable with not getting involved in the long-term or day-to-day decision making that is undertaken by the Class A voting shareholders, the board of directors, and the executive team (i.e. the President, Vice-President, Secretary, Treasurer, etc.).  The difficulty with these class of shares may be in trying to value them (i.e. getting to a “redemption amount”).  This will be negotiated by the corporation (through its directors/officers) and the potential shareholders.  Typically, valuing shares is based on the future earning potential of the corporation discounted to today and then divided among the shares.  When you add up all the future expected dividends of a particular class of shares, you’ll end up with something that resembles the future price of the share today.  It’s more of an art than a science to value shares.  Getting a professional valuator, accountant, or lawyer involved could help get to a fair market value.  At the end of the day, the value of a Class C preference income-splitting shares will be whatever the potential shareholder and the corporation are willing to agree upon (which depends on a number of real life circumstances).

written by admin \\ tags: articles of incorporation, business incorporation, business lawyers, class a shares, class b shares, common voting shares, corporation, cumulative dividend, income-splitting shares, incorporation, lawyer, lawyers, limited liability company, preferred non-voting shares, shareholder, shareholders, shareholdings

Please note that the information provided herein is not legal advice and is provided for informational and educational purposes only.  If you need legal advice with respect to drafting articles of incorporation, corporate by-laws, shareholder agreements, or resolutions involving shares, you should seek professional assistance (e.g. make a post on Dynamic Lawyers).  We have Toronto and Ottawa business lawyers registered on the website who can answer your questions and assist you in those regards.

What are shares?  What kinds of characteristics do they have?  How are they valued?  Well, in this blog, I’ll be addressing these issues in the context of a federal corporation governed by the Canada Business Corporations Act.

Lets begin with the basics.

Incorporated businesses are owned by persons (which include individuals, sole proprietorships, partnerships, trusts, joint ventures, not-for profit corporations, and other corporations) through shares.  Each corporation, through its articles of incorporation, can designate different classes of shares (i.e. shares with different characteristics).  At a minimum, section 24(3) the Act requires that a corporation have at least one class of shares.  That class of shares are called voting shares because they allow the holders to vote at any shareholder meetings.  They also allow the shareholders to receive dividends as declared from time to time and in the discretion of the board of directors (recall that the shareholders vote in the board of directors through an election).  Finally, the voting shares give their holders the right to receive the remaining property of the corporation on dissolution.   Remember that creditors (secured and unsecured) are entitled to be repaid before shareholders upon dissolution.

If the articles of incorporation provide for more than one class of share, then things can get interesting.  For example, a corporation can have 3 classes of shares (call them Class A, B, and C), all of which carry different rights with respect to voting (voting vs. non-voting), dividends (variable vs. fixed), and priority upon dissolution.  For example, Class C shares may be non-voting, having a right to regular dividends, and have priority over Class A shares.  This puts the Class A shareholders at risk of not getting anything if the corporation goes into dissolution – particularly if there isn’t enough assets to pay out creditors and priority shareholders.

Whenever shares are issued (i.e. sold/transferred to a shareholder in exchange for money, property, or past services rendered – see s. 25(3)), their value fluctuates depending on (1) the value of the company and (2) the total number of issued and outstanding shares.  With respect to the latter, if the corporation continues issuing more shares to different parties, then the original shareholders’ shares will be diluted in value.  In privately-held companies, valuing the shares is much more difficult.  Sometimes, shareholders value the shares as a multiple of something (e.g. book value) instead of potential earnings discounted to today. The value of the shares is typically pre-determined according to some formula set out in a Shareholders Agreement.  If a Shareholder Agreement doesn’t exist, the parties can seek help through a lawyer, consultant, business valuator, accountant, etc.  At the end of the day, the fair market value of the shares is typically described as the price that two arms length individuals would be willing to buy/sell the shares if they didn’t have to (i.e. if they weren’t forced to).

Finally worth mentioning is that the ability to transfer shares may be restricted in the Articles of Incorporation or a Shareholders Agreement.  Such restrictions are worthy of another blog entry entirely.  Furthermore, private corporations (unlike public ones) are restricted in terms of the number of shares they can have issued and outstanding.  Specifically, private corporations can only have 50 different shareholders or less.

written by admin \\ tags: articles of incorporation, business, business incorporation, business lawyers, canada business corporations act, incorporators, lawyer, lawyers, shareholder, shareholder agreements, shareholder meetings, shareholders, shareholders vote, shareholdings, toronto