Dynamic Lawyers
Need an Ontario Lawyer?
Make a Post. Get FREE Quotes!
 
Call: (647) 680-9530
 
Home
Home
Sign in
Sign in
Make a Post
Make a Post
DL Blog
DL Blog
About Us
About Us
About Us
FREE Checkup
Terms of Use
Terms of Use
Help
Help
Privacy Policy
Privacy Policy
Disclaimer
Disclaimer
Contact Us
Contact Us
  • Home
  • About Michael Carabash
  • Disclaimer
Mar 27

Toronto Attorneys

Access to Justice Comments Off

Michael CarabashThere are over 17,000 individuals in Toronto who can call themselves a Toronto attorney.  Each Toronto attorney typically has his or her own specialty.  The day of the general practitioner is not as it once was (and is slowly fading away).  In fact, specialization is a preferred strategy to earn above-average returns in any given industry.  Besides, think of how hard it would be for a lawyer who ‘does it all’ to keep up to date with the changing laws in every given legal area.  It’s way too difficult and that’s where negligence cases may arise.

In any event, I thought I’d spend some time discussing the various types of Toronto attorneys that you can come across on a day-to-day basis.  Here’s the first breakdown of types of Toronto attorneys (please keep in mind that this list of the types of lawyers out there is not exhaustive):

  • Toronto Real Estate Attorneys: help you buy and sell residential, investment, farm, cottage, recreational, condominium, and cooperative properties.  They also you get a mortgage financing and refinancing as well.
  • Toronto Personal Injury Attorneys: help you litigate, settle, or otherwise resolve claims arising from:
    • accident benefits claims
    • dog bites
    • disability claims
    • medical malpractice
    • motor vehicle accidents
    • negligence actions
    • personal injury claims
    • product liability
    • slip and falls
  • Toronto Business Attorneys: help you to incorporate and organize, merge/amalgamate, and dissolve your business.  They can help prepare, review, interpret, revise, negotiate, litigate, and resolve the following business documents:
    • shareholder agreement
    • partnership agreement
    • joint venture agreement
    • franchise agreement
    • commercial leases
    • business acquisitions
    • regulatory compliance
    • constructions contracts
    • employment agreements
  • Toronto Wills and Estates Attorneys: they offer services from a basic will and powers of attorney  to more complicated tax-planning structures, such as inter-vivos trusts and estates freezes.  They can also help personal representatives in the administration and distribution of estate assets.  Finally, they can litigate on behalf of beneficiaries or the estate trustee on issues such as mental capacity of the testator, validity of a will, etc.
  • Toronto Family Attorneys: they can help you with your marriage breakup by drafting a separation agreement.  They can also help you with issues such as divorce, spousal and child support, child custody, possession of the matrimonial home, and the equalization of net family property.
  • Toronto Criminal Defense Attorneys: they can help represent you against government bodies that have charged you with criminal or provincial offences (e.g. careless driving), including:
    • DUI (driving under the influence)
    • assault
    • sexual assault
    • fraud
    • theft
  • Share/Bookmark

written by admin \\ tags: accident, accidents, agreement, attorneys, beneficiaries, business, business acquisitions, commercial leases, contracts, criminal, custody, defense, Dynamic Lawyers, family, franchise agreement, fraud, incorporation, incorporators, injuries, injury, investment farm, joint venture toronto personal actions, law, lawyer, lawyers, liabilities, litigants, litigation, marriage, mentality, negligence, negligence cases, negotiating, Negotiations, offence, partnership, personal injury claims, practitioner, preferred strategy, property, revisions, separation, shareholder, shareholders, shareholdings, testator, toronto, toronto attorney, toronto attorneys, toronto business, toronto real estate, Wills and Estates

Mar 22

Toronto law firms

History of DL Comments Off

Michael CarabashToronto law firms can help answer your legal questions, facilitate your transaction (e.g. business, real estate, wills and estates, family, etc.) or even represent you in court.  To find a Toronto lawyer or law firm, go to Dynamic Lawyers and make a post.  It’s free and anonymous and Toronto lawyers and law firms will respond to you with information and quotes for you to compare.

Here are some of the different types of law that Toronto law firms can assist you in:

  • Accidents and Injuries: Involved in an accident where you suffered personal injury?
  • Business: Need corporate or commercial agreements? Need to have a lawyer help you do a transaction?
  • Charities and Not-For-Profit: Need to establish a Not-For-Profit corporation or obtain charity status?
  • Civil Litigation – Higher Court: Have a serious legal claim that needs to be litigated in the Superior Court, Divisional Court, etc.?
  • Civil Litigation – Small Claims Court: Have a legal claim (e.g. breach of contract, negligence, etc.) for less than $10,000?
  • Constitutional / Human Rights and Freedoms: Challenging a law or government action / inaction?
    Criminal: Charged with a criminal offence? Appealing a conviction?
  • Employment and Labour: Need an employment agreement? Unjustly terminated? Need to know your rights?
  • Family: Going through a separation or divorce? Fighting to get custody or access? Dealing with spousal and child support?
  • Government: Need to lobby the government? Need to resolve a dispute with a government agency?
  • Highway Traffic Tickets: Charged with speeding or DUI? Need to fight traffic tickets?
  • Immigration: Need to immigrate to Canada? Fighting against deportation?
  • Insurance: Having difficulties with your Insurance company?.
  • Intellectual Property: Need to register a copyright or trademark? Need help with a patent?
  • Landlord and Tenant: Need a resolve a dispute? Need to know your rights?.
  • Notary Public / Commissioner: Need to notarize or commission your documents?
  • Real Estate: Need someone to facilitate your residential or commercial purchase, sale, or lease?
  • Tax: Need help structuring your tax affairs? Need help resolving tax disputes with the Canada Revenue Agency?
  • Wills, Estates and Trusts: Need a will? Need to update your will? Find out why having an up-to-date will is a must.

Try to consult with a couple of Toronto law firms and Toronto attorneys until you’re comfortable with whom you’re speaking with.  Toronto law firms differ in size, location, expertise, and reputation.  Go to Dynamic Lawyers and save time and money finding the right Toronto law firms and Toronto attorneys who specialize in the legal area you require!

  • Share/Bookmark

written by admin \\ tags: accident, accidents, agreement, attorneys, breach, breach of contract, charity status, Civil Litigation, commercial agreements, commissioners, company intellectual property, contracts, conviction, corpor, corporation, court, criminal, criminal offence, custody, different, different types of law, divisional court, family, firms, government need, human rights and freedoms, injuries, injury, insurance, landlord and tenant, law, lawyer, lawyers, legal claim, litigants, litigation, money, negligence, notarize, notary, offence, publicity, purchaser, quotes, separation, small claims court, support government, toronto, toronto law firms, toronto lawyer, toronto lawyers, traffic, types of law, Wills and Estates

Mar 14

Types of Lawyers – Part 1

Access to Justice Comments Off

Michael CarabashTypes of lawyers.  There are lots in Toronto (as in every major city across North America).  Each has his or her own specialty.  The day of the general practitioner is not as it once was (and is slowly fading away).  In fact, specialization is a preferred strategy to earn above-average returns in any given industry.  Besides, think of how hard it would be for a lawyer who ‘does it all’ to keep up to date with the changing laws in every given legal area.  It’s way too difficult and that’s where negligence cases may arise.

In any event, I thought I’d spend some time discussing the various types of lawyers that you can come across on a day-to-day basis.  Here’s the first breakdown of types of lawyers in Toronto (please keep in mind that this list of the types of lawyers out there is not exhaustive):

  • Toronto Real Estate Lawyers: help you buy and sell residential, investment, farm, cottage, recreational, condominium, and cooperative properties.  They also you get a mortgage financing and refinancing as well.
  • Toronto Personal Injury Lawyers: help you litigate, settle, or otherwise resolve claims arising from:
    • accident benefits claims
    • dog bites
    • disability claims
    • medical malpractice
    • motor vehicle accidents
    • negligence actions
    • personal injury claims
    • product liability
    • slip and falls
  • Toronto Business lawyers: help you to incorporate and organize, merge/amalgamate, and dissolve your business.  They can help prepare, review, interpret, revise, negotiate, litigate, and resolve the following business documents:
    • shareholder agreement
    • partnership agreement
    • joint venture agreement
    • franchise agreement
    • commercial leases
    • business acquisitions
    • regulatory compliance
    • constructions contracts
    • employment agreements
  • Toronto Wills and Estates Lawyers: they offer services from a basic will and powers of attorney  to more complicated tax-planning structures, such as inter-vivos trusts and estates freezes.  They can also help personal representatives in the administration and distribution of estate assets.  Finally, they can litigate on behalf of beneficiaries or the estate trustee on issues such as mental capacity of the testator, validity of a will, etc.
  • Toronto Family Lawyers: they can help you with your marriage breakup by drafting a separation agreement.  They can also help you with issues such as divorce, spousal and child support, child custody, possession of the matrimonial home, and the equalization of net family property.
  • Toronto Criminal Defense Lawyers: they can help represent you against government bodies that have charged you with criminal or provincial offences (e.g. careless driving), including:
    • DUI (driving under the influence)
    • assault
    • sexual assault
    • fraud
    • theft
  • Share/Bookmark

written by admin \\ tags: accident, accidents, business acquisitions, business lawyers, businessdefense, commercial leases, criminal, custody, family law lawyer, franchise agreement, injuries, injury, investment farm, joint venture agreement, lawyer, lawyers, lawyers in Toronto, litigants, marriage, negligence, negligence actions, negligence cases, negotiating, Negotiations, offence, partnership, personal injury claims, personal injury lawyers, personallawyer, real estate lawyers, separation, shareholder agreement, toronto, toronto motor vehicle accidents, toronto business, toronto personal injury, Toronto real estate Types of Lawyers, trusts and estates, vivos trusts, Wills and Estates

Mar 07

Custody – general principles

Family Law Comments Off

Ingrid van WeertHaving custody of your kids does not mean that they will live with you. People come into my office and say they want custody of their children. When we then talk about it, I realize that what they want more than anything is to ensure that their children to live with them. Children do not always live with the custodial parent; they live with the primary care parent. While one parent often has both custody and primary care, they are two different concepts.

The parent with primary care is the parent with whom the children live most of the time. The custodial parent is the parent who is responsible for making the important decisions with respect to the children, decisions such as medical treatment, where the children will go to school and what religion (if any) the children will be raised in.

If parents have joint custody, that means they share decision-making authority with respect to the kids. In a joint custody situation parents must be able to communicate effectively. If parents can’t communicate well, a court will not normally order joint custody. In that case the primary care parent is normally the parent who gets sole custody and sole decision making power. The other parent will normally be given visitation rights (access) but will have very limited decision-making power with respect to the children.

You may also have heard the terms “shared custody” and “split custody”. To make things confusing, in these cases the word custody is being used to describe where the children live, rather than to describe decision-making power. Shared custody means that the kids spend almost equal amounts of time with each parent. Split custody means the kids are split up, with one (or more) of the kids living with one parent and one (or more) living with the other parent. Child support is calculated differently in these cases.

It is possible to spend tens of thousands of dollars fighting over custody. In almost all cases I urge my clients not to do this. If you cannot agree on who gets custody, rather than spending your retirement funds on litigating over this consider not having any agreement or order regarding custody. Neither parent has custody; instead, stipulate in your Separation Agreement how major decisions regarding your children will be made. For instance, a Separation Agreement can provide that:

(i) neither parent may make a unilateral decision with respect to the health, schooling or
religion of a child;

(ii) when these issues arise they will consult each other and try to reach a mutually
acceptable decision; and

(iii) if they cannot agree they will go to mediation, and if necessary, arbitration, to resolve
the issue.

This is only one example of the type of clause that can be negotiated in a Separation Agreement to avoid litigation over the issue of custody.

  • Share/Bookmark

written by Ingrid van Weert \\ tags: child support, custodial parent, custody, different concepts, Family Law, important decisions, joint custody, medical treatment, parents, primary care, religion, share decision, sole custody, sole decision, split custody, visitation rights

Feb 20

Marriage contracts: a cynical tool or a good idea?

Family Law 1 Comment »

Ingrid van WeertFor most people there is nothing that can take the romance out of an engagement faster than the request for a marriage contract. Somehow marriage contracts seem inconsistent with the commitment that is the essence of marriage. However, sometimes a marriage contract may be a good idea.

A marriage contract defines rights and obligations during marriage or on separation, divorce or death. In the absence of a contract, these rights and obligations are governed by the family law legislation in effect in Ontario. Because it must be applied to many different fact situations, the legislation is not tailor-made. It also gives a lot of discretion to judges, making it quite unpredictable on occasion. Many different judges, with many different points of view, hear family law cases. Finally, the legislation can change. Ontario has had two major revisions of its family law legislation since 1978. The laws that would govern your rights if you were to divorce today may not be the laws that will govern your rights if you divorce in the future.

A marriage contract permits couples to design a tailor-made result rather than being governed by legislation. They may do this because the legislation does not seem fair to them, because it does not suit their needs or because they want to try to avoid litigation if the marriage ends. Seen in this light, marriage contracts are not cynical; they are simply a tool couples use to define and tailor their rights.

For instance…

There are many reasons to contract out of the legislation. In general terms, and subject to some important exceptions, the legislation provides that spouses jointly share their net increase in wealth from the date of marriage to the date of separation or death. If one spouse is very wealthy at the time of the marriage, the legislation could result in a windfall to the other spouse. Through a marriage contract the spouses could agree to an unequal division in the increase in wealth. This does not mean the poorer spouse gets nothing; the spouses can negotiate a fair result. For instance, they could agree that the property division would vary depending on the number of years the marriage lasts.

A couple may also wish to contract out of the property provisions of the legislation if they are both financially independent and don’t want any claim to the other’s assets, or if either spouse has children from a previous marriage. In the latter case a marriage contract can ensure that the majority of the spouses’ assets goes to his or her children and not to the second spouse. As in the first example, this does not mean that the spouse is treated unfairly; the marriage contract can balance the interests of the spouse with the interests of the children.

Marriage contracts do not need to be signed before the marriage. They can be negotiated at any time. Sometimes they actually help couples in trouble make their marriage work. If a couple has experienced troubles in their marriage they may want a marriage contract going forward. Being clear about what would happen if a relationship ends (ie. knowing you will be treated fairly) can help some couples rebuild the trust they need to stay together.

What cannot be contracted

One large advantage marriage contracts have over legislation is flexibility – they can deal with one issue or asset or many issues and all assets. With the exceptions noted below, the potential terms of a marriage contract are limited only by the imagination. However, marriage contracts cannot deal with custody of or access to children or a spouses’ rights to possession of the matrimonial home. Further, any provisions in a marriage contract relating to the support, education or moral training of a child may be disregarded by a court if it believes the provision is not in the child’s best interest.

Cohabitation agreements

The law in Ontario also recognizes cohabitation agreements. People who are living together, or who intend to live together, may enter into a contract outlining their rights and obligations during or after their cohabitation, or on death. Cohabitation agreements are often a very good idea because the law in Ontario does not do much to protect the property rights of common law spouses. If you are in a common law relationship it would probably be a very good idea to define your property rights by contract. However, these contracts must be drafted carefully because unless it provides otherwise, a cohabitation agreement becomes a marriage contract if the parties marry each other.

In short, if your partner proposes a marriage contract or a cohabitation agreement don’t assume it means they don’t love you as much as they should. There are lots of times such contracts make sense. In fact, you may want to consider one yourself.

___________

Ingrid van Weert is a compassionate and dedicated family lawyer with extensive experience in both divorce law and in all forms of dispute resolution available in the divorce process – negotiation, mediation, arbitration and litigation. She can be reached at ingrid@ontariodivorcelaw.ca or at 416-214-1501.

  • Share/Bookmark

written by Ingrid van Weert \\ tags: agreement, arbitration, cohabitation Family Law, contracts, court, custody, engagements, fairness, family, judges, lawyer, lawyers, litigants, litigation, major, marriage, mediator, negotiating, Negotiations, relationships, revisions, separation, what to include in a marriage contract

Feb 20

Marriage vs. common law: what you should know!

Family Law 2 Comments »

Ingrid van WeertOne of the most common and most damaging misconceptions I hear as a family lawyer is the idea that people in common law relationships have the same legal rights as married spouses do. No, no, no! If you’re in a common law relationship and think you have the same rights as if you were married, you’re wrong. And that mistake could cost you very dearly if your relationship ends.

At the end of a relationship, whether marriage or common law, the five main issues are custody of children, visitation rights for the non-custodial parent, child support, spousal support and division of property. There are many other issues that may come up as well – possession of the matrimonial home, life insurance, immigration status, wills and powers of attorney to name a few – but those are the big five.

In the first three categories there is not much difference between being married and living common law. The law tries to treat all children equally so the rights of children born in common law relationships are generally the same as those born into marriages. However, when it comes to spousal support and dividing property accumulated during a relationship there are very important differences between marriage and common law relationships.

Spousal support

If you are married you can claim spousal support under either the Divorce Act or under the Family Law Act. If you cohabit you don’t have spousal support rights under the Divorce Act. And the difference between the rights of married spouses and the rights of common law spouses under the Family Law Act is apparent right in the definition of spouse. A married spouse is a spouse – and hence has spousal support rights – from the instant they are married. A person is not even considered a spouse in a common law relationship unless they have been cohabiting continuously for three years or they are in a relationship of some permanence and are the natural or adoptive parents of a child. In other words, at the end of a common law relationship you can’t even seek spousal support unless you cohabited for more than three years or you and your partner have a child together.

Property rights

The difference in spousal support rights is minor compared to the difference in property rights between married and common law spouses. This is where I see people seriously hurt by the common assumption that the law treats married couples and common law couples equally.

In Ontario the Family Law Act gives married spouses very specific property rights; it does not give any property rights to common law spouses. A common law spouse can assert a property claim under a doctrine called constructive trust but these claims are difficult and costly to prove and are far less generous than the rights given to married spouses by the Family Law Act. In other words, if you let your partner put all or most of the property in his or her name in a common law relationship you may find he or she gets to keep it all, even if your income and work helped buy it.

The lesson in this is that if you live in a common law relationship you must make sure that you accumulate property in your own name. Don’t let all property go into the name of your spouse on the assumption that if your relationship ends, the property will be divided between you. That is not how the law works for common law relationships. Another solution is to enter into a cohabitation agreement setting out how property will be divided if the relationship ends. But please don’t assume you have the same property rights as your married friends.

Ingrid van Weert is a compassionate and dedicated family lawyer with extensive experience in both divorce law and in all forms of dispute resolution available in the divorce process – negotiation, mediation, arbitration and litigation. She can be reached at ingrid@ontariodivorcelaw.ca or at 416-214-1501.

  • Share/Bookmark

written by Ingrid van Weert \\ tags: agreement, arbitration, common law, continuings, custody, damages, family, insurance, lawyer, lawyers, litigants, litigation, marriage, mediator, negotiating, Negotiations, parents, property rights, relationships, spousal support

Search

Latest Public Posts:

  • Property Tax in Previ...
  • Testamentary trust...
  • Land Lord denying me ...
  • Childs Rights...
  • Corporation moving to...
  • Enforcment of summary...
  • Common Law Question...
  • My Partner's spouse h...
  • Common law...
  • slip and fell...

Need a Lawyer?

    Toronto Business Lawyer

    Toronto Wills and Estates Lawyer

FREE Legal Stuff:

    Free Legal Health Checkup

    Free Legal Guides

As Featured In...

    Dynamic Lawyers in the News

Report: Toronto Lawyer Fees

    End of the Billable Hour?
    See all Stats and Reports...

eBook: Online Legal Marketing

    4 Steps to Online Legal Marketing
    See all Stats and Reports...

Boost Your Web Traffic!

    20 Free tips to boost traffic to your legal website
    See all Stats and Reports...

Business Organizations

    Business Organizations in Ontario (eBook)
    See all Stats and Reports...

Wills and Estates (eBook)

    Wills and Estates (eBook) in Ontario
    See all Stats and Reports...

Buying / Selling Real Estate

    Buying and Selling Residential Real Estate in Ontario
    See all Stats and Reports...

Limited Partnerships

    Limited Partnerships (Ontario)
    See all Stats and Reports...

Legal Forms + Video Guides

Legal Forms + Video Guides

Lawyer Prepared + Affordable!

Revocation of Will: $17
Revocation of POA: $17
Affidavits of Execution: $17
Living Will: $27
Codicil: $27
Non-Compete: $27
Non-Solicit: $27
Power of Attorney: $37
Residential Sublease: $37
Residential Lease: $47
Employment Agm't: $47
Employee Termination: $47
Confidentiality Agm't: $47
Settlement Agm't: $47
Auto-Accident Release: $47
Plaintiff's Claim: $47
Last Will: $97
Cohabitation Agm't: $97
Ind't Contractor Agm't: $97

How to Purchase:

Get the Flash Player to see this content.
Get the Flash Player to see this content.

DL in Social Media

Follow Michael Carabash on Twitter Become a Fan of Dynamic Lawyers on Facebook See Michael Carabash's LinkedIn Profile

Categories

  • Access to Justice (91)
  • Bankruptcy/Insolvency (5)
  • Business Law (117)
  • Canada Income Tax (13)
  • Charity/Not-For-Profit (8)
  • Civil Litigation (20)
  • Criminal Law (44)
  • Employment (26)
  • Family Law (52)
  • History of DL (159)
  • Immigration (1)
  • Intellectual Property (4)
  • Landlord | Tenant (13)
  • Lawyers & Technology (68)
  • Marketing & Promotion (65)
  • Negotiations (3)
  • Personal Injury (15)
  • Real Estate (37)
  • Sole Practitioner (14)
  • Wills and Estates (63)

Terms of Use

The content on the DL Blog is provided for educational and informational purposes only. It is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should not rely upon or act on information in this blog without seeking legal advice (e.g. by making a post on Dynamic Lawyers) as to any matters of specific concern to them. Dynamic Lawyers Ltd. is not responsible for and does not necessarily agree with the contents of comments posted by readers of the DL Blog. Such comments represent the personal views of the commentators only and are included on this blog in the interest of promoting public discourse and a free exchange of ideas. Dynamic Lawyers Ltd. reserves the right to delete any comment posted on this site which we, in our sole and absolute discretion, deem inappropriate for publication on this site.

FREE Legal Resources!

FREE Legal Guides

Legal Line

Advice Scene

Duhaime

Canada Legal

Canlii

Continuing Legal Education Ontario

Legal Tree

IsThatLegal

Finalist: Legal Culture Award

Finalist for Legal Culture Award

Meta

  • Entries (RSS)
  • Comments (RSS)
  • WordPress
  • Log in

© 2008-2010 Dynamic Lawyers Ltd.  All Rights Reserved.

Family Law | Personal Injury Law | Criminal Law | Real Estate Law
Labour and Employment Law | Business Law | Tax Law
Wills and Estates Law | Landlord and Tenant Law
Highway Traffic Ticket Law | Immigration Law
Intellectual Property Law | Insurance Law