As a follow up to our new 42 page FREE eBook entitled “Buying and Selling Residential Real Estate in Ontario“, and our 28 page FREE eBoook entitled “Wills and Estates in Ontario”, we are pleased to announce the release of a new eBook entitled “Business Organizations in Ontario, Canada“:

This 33 page eBook will cover topics such as:

- What are the various business structures available to those wishing to do business in Ontario, Canada (e.g. sole proprietorship, general or limited partnership, and corporation)?

- What are the legal requirements to establish these various business structures?

- What are the advantages and disadvantages of each business structure?

- How are these business structures dissolved?

- What is the general tax treatment of these business structures?

Grab your copy today!

Remember: the information provided in the eBook is not legal advice and is provided for informational and educational purposes only.   If you need legal advice with respect to business matters (e.g. incorporating, establishing a general or limited partnership, etc.), seek professional assistance (e.g. make a post on Dynamic Lawyers).  We have Toronto, Ottawa, Hamilton, Brampton, Mississauga and other Ontario lawyers registered to help you with your business matters.

Given that business law and legal structures is a big topic, I’ll probably need to come up with another eBook in the coming months on the different other kinds of business structures available (e.g. professional corporation, franchise, joint venture, independent contractor, etc.).

written by admin \\ tags: business organizations in ontario, corporation, free ebook, general partnership, limited partnership, partnership, sole proprietorship, toronto business lawyer

Please note that the information provided herein is not legal advice and is provided for informational and educational purposes only.  If you need legal advice with respect to how to legally structure your business relationship, you should seek professional assistance (e.g. make a post on Dynamic Lawyers).  We have Toronto, Ottawa, Hamilton, Mississauga, Brampton, and other Ontario business lawyers registered on the website who can answer your questions or help you with your business structure.  I should know – I’m one of them and you can contact me directly (michael@carabashlaw.com).

So you’re talking with someone about doing business.  What’s the best structure?  You could have an employee-employer relationship.  How about a client-independent contractor relationship?  Should you be a partner, a limited partner, a limited liability partner, a general partner?  Maybe you should be a shareholder, director, or officer of a corporation?  How about being a joint venturer?  Which structure is best for you?

It all depends on what’s important to you at the time you want to do business.  If you want to try to reduce your exposure to putting your personal assets at risk of being seized or collected in a lawsuit, for example, a corporation or a limited partnership or a joint venture (using corporations or a limited partnership) may be called for.

If you want to minimize your taxes, partnerships, limited partnerships, and corporations have different advantages and disadvantages. Remember: partnerships and limited partnerships are not separate legal entities for tax purposes.  The income and expenses are passed along (that’s why they’re considered flow through entities) to the partners according to the agreement reached between them and applicable income tax rules.  You can read up on my previous blog about income tax and limited partnerships here.

In terms of ease of creation, by far, a simple general partnership is the easiest to create and maintain whereas a limited partnership or joint venture involving corporations or limited partnerships involve more paperwork and legal / accounting diligence to establish and maintain.

What about management and control?  Well, this can be taken care of through a partnership agreement, limited partnership agreement, shareholder agreement (for a corporation), or joint venture agreement.  Will it be done through a committee, a vote, will one party have ultimate and unfettered control?

If you have a client-independent contractor relationship, the contract will govern that relationship.  You should read up on my previous blogs about independent contractor agreements here, here, here and here.

The bottom line is that you need to look at various factors to determine what business structure is best for you.  If you want a simple structure, then maybe an employee, independent contractor, or partnership agreement is best.

If you’re looking to be able to take advantage of the small business tax rate on active business income for a Canadian Controlled Private Corporation, then perhaps a corporation is best. It might also make sense if you’re planning to ultimately sell your shares and take advantage of the $375,000 lifetime capital gains exemption.

If you’re looking to raise equity investment, then perhaps a limited partnership or a corporation is best.

At the end of the day, you should seek legal advice: spending an ounce of prevention today to avoid a pound of pain tomorrow is always best.  Also, a lawyer will help protect your right and advance your interests (something you may not be able to do or may not be able to do as well as a lawyer can).  So what are you waiting for: make a post on Dynamic Lawyers or contact me directly.

Remember, if you need a lawyer to review, draft, revise, negotiate or resolve a dispute concerning an independent contractor | consulting agreement, make a post on Dynamic Lawyers or contact me directly at michael@carabashlaw.com.

In case you’re a Client and looking to engage the services of an Independent Contractor in Ontario, look no further:

Independent Contractor Agreement (Client) – No Satement of Work

This Agreement can be used by a Client who wants to engage the services of an Independent Contractor (e.g. a consultant, a professional, a general worker, etc.) without creating an employment relationship. The “Client” means that this Independent Contractor Agreement favours the Client – for example, through notice, termination, standards of care, and restrictive covenants, etc. The “No Statement of Work” means that the services to be performed by the Independent Contractor are dealt with in the actual agreement and not in a Schedule (attached and incorporated into the agreement as a “Statement of Work”). There will be different versions of this agreement which favour both the Client and the Independent Contractor and which may include Schedules. Schedules aren’t absolutely necessary. They’re just one way of having an agreement instead of writing things out in the actual agreement, you simply modify the Schedule. Here’s the sample Video Guide that comes with this Independent Contractor Agreement (Client) – No Statement of Work:

Now, if you happen to be looking for an Independent Contractor | Consulting Agreement with a Statement of Work, then you’re in luck. Just go here and scroll down and, voila! The “Statement of Work” means that there is a schedule in this particular Independent Contractor Agreement to describe the services (instead of writing everything out in the actual agreement, it’s included in a Schedule). Here’s the sample Video Guide that comes with this Independent Contractor Agreement (Client) – With Statement of Work:

All of Dynamic Lawyers‘ legal forms are lawyer-prepared, simple to read, easy to customize, and only a fraction of the price a lawyer would charge. Also, each legal form comes with a FREE VIDEO GUIDE (watch a useful example of how this legal form can be customized), a FREE DL GUIDE (read helpful information about this legal form), and another FREE DL GUIDE that sheds valuable insight into how legal forms can be challenged. What are you waiting for? Best of all, if you DO need a lawyer and need some legal advice, simply make a post and get FREE quotes from Ontario lawyers focusing on the area of law you require!

Note: this information and these sample video guides are NOT legal advice and are provided for informational purposes only. If you need an Ontario lawyer, go to Dynamic Lawyers and make a post.

written by admin \\ tags: business structure, corporation, independent contractor agreement, joint venture, limited liability partnership, limited partnership

Please keep in mind that this is not legal advice.  The information provided herein is for educational purposes only. If you would like to get in touch with a lawyer to help you draft, interpret, negotiate or resolve a dispute about a joint venture, then you are encouraged to seek a professional (e.g. make a post on Dynamic Lawyers).  We have Toronto and Ottawa lawyers who can assist you in this regard (I would know, I’m one of them!).

So this blog will deal with the basics of a joint venture agreement or contract.  In other blogs, I’ll get down to the nitty gritty.

Definition
Plaint and simple, a joint venture is a contract between two or more parties to share resources, knowledge, skills, etc. towards a common objective.

Parties
As usual in these types of agreements, the parties are identified at the get-go (make sure this is done properly or else your contract won’t be worth the paper it’s written on!).

Recitals
This is the background story you want to tell that leads up to the formation of the joint venture.  It could go something like: Party X does Y and has Z.  Party A does B and has C.  The two would now like to join forces to make even more $$$.  So they’re agreeing to have a joint venture in accordance with the terms and conditions set out in the joint venture agreement or contract…

Definitions
It’s a good idea to set out the definitions you’re going to be relying upon near the top of the joint venture agreement (for ease of reference and good organization).  You could include definitions here about “Confidential Information” (assuming there will be confidential information passed between the parties as a result of the joint venture), what constitutes “Force Majeure” (e.g. act of God that relieves a party of liability under the agreement in certain circumstances), etc.

Business Structure
The joint venture agreement or contract will generally state how the joint venture is structured.  Is it simply two separate entities acting in concert through the joint venture agreement or contract?  Will there be a new corporation formed?  Will there be a partnership formed?  Will that partnership be a general or limited liability partnership?  For more discussion about the general forms of business one can structure in Ontario, check out this free information about business structures we’ve been accumulating.

Nature of the Relationship
So will the joint venturers be partners (capable of binding each other), corporate shareholders, or simply joint venturers (i.e. their rights and obligations are limited to the terms of the joint venture agreement or contract).

Term and Termination
How long will the joint venture last for and what events give rise to its premature termination?  Will the parties simply be able to give each other notice?  Will the joint venture dissolve by operation of law, by one party filing for bankruptcy, by one party attempting to illegally assign their interest in the joint venture to a third party, etc.?  Again, you should consult with a lawyer to find out what kinds of things typically go in this section.  Also important is what to do in the even of default.  Does one of the joint venturers become liable to pay the other if they are at fault?  Who determines fault and according to what test (e.g. sole and absolute discretion)?  There’s a lot to think about here…

Joint Venture Assets and Benefits
How will these things be deal with?  Will there be a percentage of ownership?  Will the benefits be based on revenues or profits?  Can these interests be assigned?

Operations
How will the joint venture be operated on a day-to-day basis?  Will the joint venture committee have the power to enter contracts on behalf of the joint venture?  Perhaps the joint venture committee will create a new corporation to take on a certain responsibilities and simply own equally the shares of the new corporation.  That new corporation would operate as a separate business, but its shareholders would be the joint venturers (who would elect the directors, who in turn would appoint the day-to-day officers).  This would be a good place to put reporting and record-keeping requirements too.

Joint Venture Responsibilities
Here, we get to the nitty gritty of who will be responsible for what in the joint venture. Separate paragraphs will be needed for each of the parties.

Joint Venture Management
Will there be a committee?  Will representatives from each of the parties be on the commitee?  Will there be a chairperson?  How will meetings be managed, votes and decision made?  Will there be direction from owners and delegation to the committee?  In my opinion, and as I’ve previously blogged about, businesses should be run as dictatorships with consultants, not as democracies (too many voices means things won’t get done).  

Representations and Warranties
What kinds of true, fair, and complete statements must the parties make to induce the other parties to enter the agreement?  The parties want to know that their joint venturer partners have the authorization and operational wherewithall to do what it is they are about to do.  If these representations and warranties no longer hold true, then what’s the consequence?  Notice?  Termination?  This should be spelled out here…

Liability and Indemnification
Will the joint venturers try to limit their liability from each other in connection with the joint venture?  Will they indemnify each other for their own wrongdoing – whether in contract, tort, negligence, misconduct, breach of statute or otherwise?

General Terms and Conditions
This section of the Joint Venture Agreement will deal with things like (which I’ve previously touched on in teh context of an independent contractor agreement):

• Notices
• Entire Agreement
• Governing Law
• Interpretation
• Assignment
• Waiver
• Cumulative Remedies
• Counterparts
• Enurement
• Entire Agreement
• Time of Essence
• Independent Legal Advice
• Force Majeure
• Severability
• Survival
• Currency

written by admin \\ tags: agreement, assets, bankruptcies, bankruptcy, blog, breach, business, circumstances, confidentiality, contracts, corporation, indemnification, lawyer, lawyers, liabilities, negligence, negotiating, Negotiations, partnership, percentages, relationships, separation, shareholder, shareholders, shareholdings, toronto

Please note that the information provided herein is not legal advice and is provided for informational and educational purposes only.  If you need legal advice with respect to creating a limited liability company or amending a corporation’s articles of incorporation, you should seek professional assistance (e.g. make a post on Dynamic Lawyers).  We have Toronto and Ottawa business lawyers registered on the website who can answer your questions or help you with your  Ontario or Federal corporations.

As a follow up to my recent post about income-splitting shares, I neglected to mention one of the biggest benefits of using income splitting preference shares: income splitting to reduce reduce household taxes.

Take the following example.  You have a corporation.  It earns $300,000 in taxable income.  Because of the small business credit (which I will be discussing in a future blog post), the corporation only pays 16.5% tax on that amount (this rate is going down to 15.5% starting July 1, 2010).  What do you do with the after-tax dollars?  Well, you could either keep it in the company and let it accumulate or you could dividend it out.  The latter is where the income-splitting shares come into play.  You can simply give these shares to members of your family who have little or no income.  Then, when the corporation’s directors (e.g. you) declares a dividend to the shareholders of this class of shares, they will receive and have to pay tax on those dividends.  They will get the benefit of the dividend tax credit.  But the beautiful thing is that less taxes end up being paid than if someone (e.g. you) had a higher income and received the same dividends (because of how our marginal taxes work).  These shares are not susceptible to the attribution rules found in the Canada Income Tax Act.

Remember, if you need help structuring your corporation to create income-splitting preference shares, you should make a post on Dynamic Lawyers.

written by admin \\ tags: articles of incorporation, business, canada, Canada Income Tax, canadian income tax, canadian income taxation, corporation, declarations, dividend, dividend tax credit, income tax act, incorporation, lawyers, shareholder, shareholders

Please note that the information provided herein is not legal advice and is provided for informational and educational purposes only.  If you need legal advice with respect to creating a limited liability company or amending a corporation’s articles of incorporation, you should seek professional assistance (e.g. make a post on Dynamic Lawyers).  We have Toronto and Ottawa business lawyers registered on the website who can answer your questions or help you with your  Ontario or Federal corporations.

Sure, you’ve heard it before: corporations typically have Class A shares (or common voting shares) and Class B shares (or preferred non-voting shares).  But have you heard of Class C shares which are designed specifically for income-splitting?  The reality is that, so long as you have one type of common voting share, you can be quite innovative with the characteristics you assign to other classes of shares.

So lets get into nitty gritty of what I mean byClass C “income-splitting” shares.  Basically, these are a class of shares that are subservient to Class A and Class B shares in virtually all regards. Specifically, you can design Class C shares such that they:

• have no voting rights;
• have no voting rights or right to dissent with respect to issues revolving around shares, classes of shares, cancellation of shares, issuance of shares, etc.;
• have a right to receive a non-cumulative dividend (as determined and declared by the board of directors from time to time);
• be redeemable by the corporation for a pre-determined price (e.g. $1.00);
• be redeemable by the corporation upon liquidation, dissolution, or winding up for a pre-determined price (e.g. $1.00 each);
• be denied entitlement to any additional profit above and beyond what was declared by the board (which would go to Class A and/or Class B shareholders)

So what’s the purpose of having such a subservient class of shares subect to the rights and entitlements of Class A and Class B shares?  Simple: keep corporate control out of these shareholders’ hands while giving them compensation in the form of dividends from time to time .  These class of shares can be redeemed (which means cancelled) for a pre-determined “redemption amount”.  Overall, this class of share seems good for a silent investor who is comfortable with not getting involved in the long-term or day-to-day decision making that is undertaken by the Class A voting shareholders, the board of directors, and the executive team (i.e. the President, Vice-President, Secretary, Treasurer, etc.).  The difficulty with these class of shares may be in trying to value them (i.e. getting to a “redemption amount”).  This will be negotiated by the corporation (through its directors/officers) and the potential shareholders.  Typically, valuing shares is based on the future earning potential of the corporation discounted to today and then divided among the shares.  When you add up all the future expected dividends of a particular class of shares, you’ll end up with something that resembles the future price of the share today.  It’s more of an art than a science to value shares.  Getting a professional valuator, accountant, or lawyer involved could help get to a fair market value.  At the end of the day, the value of a Class C preference income-splitting shares will be whatever the potential shareholder and the corporation are willing to agree upon (which depends on a number of real life circumstances).

written by admin \\ tags: articles of incorporation, business incorporation, business lawyers, class a shares, class b shares, common voting shares, corporation, cumulative dividend, income-splitting shares, incorporation, lawyer, lawyers, limited liability company, preferred non-voting shares, shareholder, shareholders, shareholdings

Please note that the information provided herein is not legal advice and is provided for informational and educational purposes only.   If you need legal advice with respect to drafting or reviewing Articles of Incorporation, you should seek professional assistance (e.g. make a post on Dynamic Lawyers).  We have Toronto business lawyers registered on the website who can answer your questions or help you draft and submit articles of incorporation for Ontario or Federal corporations.

Incorporating a business: a few words should be written about the roles and responsibilities of those involved with and acting on behalf of or for the corporation.

A corporation is created by having the initial directors file articles of incorporation in the jurisdiction in which the corporation is going to have its head office (provincial licenses will also be required to operate the corporation in particularly provinces).

After this, the directors have got a few things to do to get the corporation organized and up and running.  For example, they will need to pass a By-Law (which gives the corporation’s directors power-making authority), pass director resolutions, issue shares to shareholders (and have the shareholders subscribe to shares), have the shareholders ratify the by-law, have the shareholders vote in the new directors, etc.  Without these essential steps and documents, a corporation is not a legally operational entity.

The board of directors is comprised of individuals and typically a chairperson who oversee the affairs of the corporation , but not typically on a day-to-day basis.  The directors are typically paid to sit on the board, but it’s not a lot of money (as compared with the corporate officers) because they don’t meet that often and are not responsible for the day-to-day affairs of the corporation (as officers are).  The board is typically comprised of individuals with expertise in certain areas and who sit on a number of corporate boards.  They offer their insight and are accountable to the shareholders who vote them in.

For their part, shareholders are the owners of the corporation and have the power to vote in the directors of the corporation.  If there is only one sole shareholder holding all of the shares of the corporation then that person could vote in all of the directors.  It is possible to have only one shareholder and one director of a corporation.

Finally, officers of a corporation are appointed by the board of directors in order to oversee the day-to-day management of the corporation’s affairs.  The titles of officers are not that important, although traditionally most people have come to know officers as one of the following: President, Chief Executive Officer, Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, Vice-President, etc.  It does not really matter what these individuals are called.  Often, their titles, roles, and responsibilities will be outlined in a corporate by-law, which establishes their position and sets out their qualifications, powers, duties, etc.  Officers can be replaced by the board of directors, to whom they are accountable.

So to summarize: shareholders with voting power will vote in the directors on an annual basis (or sooner in certain circumstances), directors have the power to manage the corporation and they meet only a few times a year, and officers (e.g. CEO, VP, CFO, Treasurer, President, etc.) are the people who run the corporation on a daily basis and who are appointed (not elected) by the directors on an annual (or sooner in certain circumstances) basis.

written by admin \\ tags: answers to questions, articles of incorporation, assets and liabilities, blog, board of directors, breach, breach of contract, business lawyers, circumstances, contracts, corporation, federal corporations, federal government, government fees, incorporating a business, incorporation, incorporators, initial directors, insurance, issue shares, jurisdiction, lawyer, lawyers, legal advice, legal entity, limited liability company, nuans, nuans name search, professional assistance, provincial licenses, report, resolutions, search report, separation, shareholders, shareholders vote, toronto, toronto business

Please note that the information provided herein is not legal advice and is provided for informational and educational purposes only.  If you need legal advice with respect to creating a limited liability company, you should seek professional assistance (e.g. make a post on Dynamic Lawyers).  We have Toronto business lawyers registered on the website who can answer your questions or help you draft and submit articles of incorporation for Ontario or Federal corporations.

Want to know to incorporate?  First, if you’re trying to do it yourself, it’s pretty straightforward.  You just need to figure out which jurisdiction you’re trying to incorporate and then use a website service provider that will allow you to submit articles of incorporation, conduct a NUANS name search and submit a NUANS name search report, etc.  While the government fees are not high to incorporate (e.g. $200 for a federal corporation, plus $20 for a NUANS name search report), there are a number of questions arise which may lead you to seek out answers to questions relating to how to incorporate.

For example, you may have questions concerning what exactly goes into the Articles of Incorporation.  You can find a previous blog about Articles of Incorporation here. “Articles of Incorporation” is the name of the document that must be submitted to the Federal Government to create a corporation.  A corporation is a separate and distinct legal entity from its incorporators and from its owners, managers, employees, etc.  A corporation has its own rights and obligations; must file its own taxes (at both the provincial and federal levels); has its own income, assets, and liabilities; and can be sued and sue other parties.  These things being said, a corporation must act through other parties (e.g. owners, managers, employees, directors, etc.), who can in turn be held liable for their actions (e.g. negligence, breach of contract, etc.), although the corporation will likely be sued in these circumstances because of things like vicarious liability, insurance, and its otherwise deep pockets.

But simply submitting and having the government approve of your incorporate package is not sufficient to have your company up and running.  In fact, the cheap incorporation companies out there that promise to incorporate your company may not help you establish by-laws (which are power-giving or authority-giving documents that make corporate actions legal), prepare director and shareholder meetings and minutes (which establish accountability and transparency by letting stakeholders know what was decided upon), and finish explaining each party’s (i.e. shareholders, directors, officers, employees) roles and responsibilities vis-a-vis the corporation. Knowing how to incorporate is a good start,  but it’s always wise to consult with a business lawyer (e.g. by making a post on Dynamic Lawyers) with respect to questions about these and other things corporation related.

The roles of the various parties in a corporation will be discussed in the next post…

written by admin \\ tags: answers to questions, articles of incorporation, assets and liabilities, blog, breach, breach of contract, business lawyers, circumstances, contracts, corporation, federal corporations, federal government, government fees, incorporation, incorporators, insurance, jurisdiction, lawyer, lawyers, legal advice, legal entity, limited liability company, negligence, nuans, nuans name search, professional assistance, report, search report, separation, service provider, shareholders, toronto, toronto business

Toronto law firms can help answer your legal questions, facilitate your transaction (e.g. business, real estate, wills and estates, family, etc.) or even represent you in court.  To find a Toronto lawyer or law firm, go to Dynamic Lawyers and make a post.  It’s free and anonymous and Toronto lawyers and law firms will respond to you with information and quotes for you to compare.

Here are some of the different types of law that Toronto law firms can assist you in:

• Accidents and Injuries: Involved in an accident where you suffered personal injury?
• Business: Need corporate or commercial agreements? Need to have a lawyer help you do a transaction?
• Charities and Not-For-Profit: Need to establish a Not-For-Profit corporation or obtain charity status?
• Civil Litigation – Higher Court: Have a serious legal claim that needs to be litigated in the Superior Court, Divisional Court, etc.?
• Civil Litigation – Small Claims Court: Have a legal claim (e.g. breach of contract, negligence, etc.) for less than $10,000?
• Constitutional / Human Rights and Freedoms: Challenging a law or government action / inaction?
  Criminal: Charged with a criminal offence? Appealing a conviction?
• Employment and Labour: Need an employment agreement? Unjustly terminated? Need to know your rights?
• Family: Going through a separation or divorce? Fighting to get custody or access? Dealing with spousal and child support?
• Government: Need to lobby the government? Need to resolve a dispute with a government agency?
• Highway Traffic Tickets: Charged with speeding or DUI? Need to fight traffic tickets?
• Immigration: Need to immigrate to Canada? Fighting against deportation?
• Insurance: Having difficulties with your Insurance company?.
• Intellectual Property: Need to register a copyright or trademark? Need help with a patent?
• Landlord and Tenant: Need a resolve a dispute? Need to know your rights?.
• Notary Public / Commissioner: Need to notarize or commission your documents?
• Real Estate: Need someone to facilitate your residential or commercial purchase, sale, or lease?
• Tax: Need help structuring your tax affairs? Need help resolving tax disputes with the Canada Revenue Agency?
• Wills, Estates and Trusts: Need a will? Need to update your will? Find out why having an up-to-date will is a must.

Try to consult with a couple of Toronto law firms and Toronto attorneys until you’re comfortable with whom you’re speaking with.  Toronto law firms differ in size, location, expertise, and reputation.  Go to Dynamic Lawyers and save time and money finding the right Toronto law firms and Toronto attorneys who specialize in the legal area you require!

written by admin \\ tags: accident, accidents, agreement, attorneys, breach, breach of contract, charity status, Civil Litigation, commercial agreements, commissioners, company intellectual property, contracts, conviction, corpor, corporation, court, criminal, criminal offence, custody, different, different types of law, divisional court, family, firms, government need, human rights and freedoms, injuries, injury, insurance, landlord and tenant, law, lawyer, lawyers, legal claim, litigants, litigation, money, negligence, notarize, notary, offence, publicity, purchaser, quotes, separation, small claims court, support government, toronto, toronto law firms, toronto lawyer, toronto lawyers, traffic, types of law, Wills and Estates

Please note that the information provided herein is not legal advice and is provided for informational and educational purposes only.  If you need legal advice with respect to creating a limited liability company, you should seek professional assistance (e.g. make a post on Dynamic Lawyers).  We have Toronto business lawyers registered on the website who can answer your questions or help you draft and submit articles of incorporation for Ontario or Federal corporations.

Limited liability companies are business that have been incorporated under a particular jurisdiction (e.g. Ontario, Federally) and which have a separate legal existence from their incorporators, shareholders, managers, and employees.  They are called limited liability companies because the personal liability of the shareholders is limited; only in limited circumstances will a court pierce or lift the corporate veil to impose personal liability on the corporate shareholders.

Specifically, courts have found that the following situations may warrant the lifting of the corporate veil and the imposing of personal liability on shareholders:

1. Sham/Cloak/Conduit/Alter Ego: Where there is a controlling shareholder or a one-man company, the company is not an alias for the owner per se.  Due regard must be had to the law of principal and agent relation to the formation of the relationship. Whenever anyone uses control of the corporation to further his own rather than the corporation’s business, he or she may be liable for the corporation’s acts.
2. Tort claims: Limited liability is fundamentally unfair to tort victims and other involuntary creditors and has undesirable consequences for labour claimants with severe informational disabilities and lack of ability to diversify and to absorb loss (source: Phillip I. Blumberg, Limited Liability and Corporate Groups, 11 J. CORP. L. 573, (1986) at pp. 616-19). As Anthony VanDuzer noted in Law of Partnerships and Corporations: “Courts have held that they have the power to ignore the separate existence of the corporation where to fail to do so would yield a result which is ‘flagrantly opposed to justice’….One could say that the courts are likely to be more sympathetic to claims by third parties, such as creditors and tort victims…”.
3. Improper purpose: If a corporation is formed solely for an illegal, fraudulent, or improper purpose, then that company will be a mere cloak or sham.  Some improper purpose examples include:  (1) a corporation was formed to solicit customers which the incorporator could not personally solicit due to non-solicitation agreement with previous employer; (2) person conveyed a house to a company to preclude selling it; and (3) corporation with no assets gave an undertaking to the court to gain an advantage for the controlling shareholders.
4. Thin capitalization: Ownership of all or almost all of the shares of a corporation by one individual, coupled with inadequate capitalization, may provide sufficient grounds for disregarding the corporate entity.
5. Representations of unlimited liability: If a firm represented that its liability is unlimited, a subsequent assertion of limited liability would constitute fraud, and the veil may be lifted.
   
6. Lack of respect for the corporate form: lack of proper corporation authorization for transaction and the use of shareholder funds to pay corporate obligations has been cited in some cases as supporting the disregard of corporate personality. Some courts have found such grounds insufficient to lift the corporate veil.

Limited liability corporation are created via submitting Articles of Incorporation.

written by admin \\ tags: articles of incorporation, business incorporation, corporation, federal incorporate, federal incorporations, how to create a federal corporation, how to incorporate, incorporate business, incorporated business, incorporation articles, limited liability company, ontario corporations, ontario incorporate, ontario incorporation, pierce the corporate veil, toronto business lawyers, vicarious liability