Dynamic Lawyers
Need an Ontario Lawyer?
Make a Post. Get FREE Quotes!
 
 
Home
Home
Sign in
Sign in
Make a Post
Make a Post
DL Blog
DL Blog
About Us
About Us
Terms of Use
Terms of Use
Help
Help
Privacy Policy
Privacy Policy
Disclaimer
Disclaimer
Contact Us
Contact Us
  • Home
  • About Michael Carabash
  • Disclaimer
Marriage vs. common law: what you should know! Helping kids adjust to separation and divorce
Feb 20

Marriage contracts: a cynical tool or a good idea?

Family Law Add comments

Ingrid van WeertFor most people there is nothing that can take the romance out of an engagement faster than the request for a marriage contract. Somehow marriage contracts seem inconsistent with the commitment that is the essence of marriage. However, sometimes a marriage contract may be a good idea.

A marriage contract defines rights and obligations during marriage or on separation, divorce or death. In the absence of a contract, these rights and obligations are governed by the family law legislation in effect in Ontario. Because it must be applied to many different fact situations, the legislation is not tailor-made. It also gives a lot of discretion to judges, making it quite unpredictable on occasion. Many different judges, with many different points of view, hear family law cases. Finally, the legislation can change. Ontario has had two major revisions of its family law legislation since 1978. The laws that would govern your rights if you were to divorce today may not be the laws that will govern your rights if you divorce in the future.

A marriage contract permits couples to design a tailor-made result rather than being governed by legislation. They may do this because the legislation does not seem fair to them, because it does not suit their needs or because they want to try to avoid litigation if the marriage ends. Seen in this light, marriage contracts are not cynical; they are simply a tool couples use to define and tailor their rights.

For instance…

There are many reasons to contract out of the legislation. In general terms, and subject to some important exceptions, the legislation provides that spouses jointly share their net increase in wealth from the date of marriage to the date of separation or death. If one spouse is very wealthy at the time of the marriage, the legislation could result in a windfall to the other spouse. Through a marriage contract the spouses could agree to an unequal division in the increase in wealth. This does not mean the poorer spouse gets nothing; the spouses can negotiate a fair result. For instance, they could agree that the property division would vary depending on the number of years the marriage lasts.

A couple may also wish to contract out of the property provisions of the legislation if they are both financially independent and don’t want any claim to the other’s assets, or if either spouse has children from a previous marriage. In the latter case a marriage contract can ensure that the majority of the spouses’ assets goes to his or her children and not to the second spouse. As in the first example, this does not mean that the spouse is treated unfairly; the marriage contract can balance the interests of the spouse with the interests of the children.

Marriage contracts do not need to be signed before the marriage. They can be negotiated at any time. Sometimes they actually help couples in trouble make their marriage work. If a couple has experienced troubles in their marriage they may want a marriage contract going forward. Being clear about what would happen if a relationship ends (ie. knowing you will be treated fairly) can help some couples rebuild the trust they need to stay together.

What cannot be contracted

One large advantage marriage contracts have over legislation is flexibility – they can deal with one issue or asset or many issues and all assets. With the exceptions noted below, the potential terms of a marriage contract are limited only by the imagination. However, marriage contracts cannot deal with custody of or access to children or a spouses’ rights to possession of the matrimonial home. Further, any provisions in a marriage contract relating to the support, education or moral training of a child may be disregarded by a court if it believes the provision is not in the child’s best interest.

Cohabitation agreements

The law in Ontario also recognizes cohabitation agreements. People who are living together, or who intend to live together, may enter into a contract outlining their rights and obligations during or after their cohabitation, or on death. Cohabitation agreements are often a very good idea because the law in Ontario does not do much to protect the property rights of common law spouses. If you are in a common law relationship it would probably be a very good idea to define your property rights by contract. However, these contracts must be drafted carefully because unless it provides otherwise, a cohabitation agreement becomes a marriage contract if the parties marry each other.

In short, if your partner proposes a marriage contract or a cohabitation agreement don’t assume it means they don’t love you as much as they should. There are lots of times such contracts make sense. In fact, you may want to consider one yourself.

___________

Ingrid van Weert is a compassionate and dedicated family lawyer with extensive experience in both divorce law and in all forms of dispute resolution available in the divorce process – negotiation, mediation, arbitration and litigation. She can be reached at ingrid@ontariodivorcelaw.ca or at 416-214-1501.

  • Share/Bookmark

Related posts:

  1. Marriage Contracts | Prenuptials Please note that the information provided herein is not legal...
  2. Toronto Attorneys There are over 17,000 individuals in Toronto who can call...
  3. Cohabitation Agreements in Ontario – What are they all about? Please note that the information provided herein is not legal...
  4. Marriage Contract Template | Prenuptial Agreement Template Please note that the information provided herein is not legal...
  5. Toronto law firms Toronto law firms can help answer your legal questions, facilitate...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

written by Ingrid van Weert \\ tags: agreement, arbitration, cohabitation Family Law, contracts, court, custody, engagements, fairness, family, judges, lawyer, lawyers, litigants, litigation, major, marriage, mediator, negotiating, Negotiations, relationships, revisions, separation, what to include in a marriage contract


One Response to “Marriage contracts: a cynical tool or a good idea?”

  1. 1. ruben snider Says:
    September 22nd, 2009 at 3:48 am

    Very timely and informative. Thanks for sharing this.

Leave a Reply

Name (required)


Mail (will not be published) (required)


Website




i3Theme 1.7 is designed by N.Design Studio, customized by MangoOrange™,
sponsored by Web Hosting Reviews, Hosting in Colombia and Web Hosting.

Search

Toronto Business Lawyer

    Toronto Business Lawyer

FREE Legal Stuff:

    Free Legal Health Checkup


    Free Legal Guides

Report: Toronto Lawyer Fees

    End of the Billable Hour?


    See all Stats and Reports...

eBook: Online Legal Marketing

    4 Steps to Online Legal Marketing


    See all Stats and Reports...

Business Organizations

    Business Organizations in Ontario (eBook)


    See all Stats and Reports...

Wills and Estates (eBook)

    Wills and Estates (eBook) in Ontario


    See all Stats and Reports...

Buying / Selling Real Estate

    Buying and Selling Residential Real Estate in Ontario


    See all Stats and Reports...

Legal Forms + Video Guides

Legal Forms + Video Guides Legal Forms + Video Guides Press Release

Links

  • DL in the News
  • DL Stats and Reports
  • E-mail Michael Carabash

DL in Social Media

Follow Michael Carabash on Twitter Become a Fan of Dynamic Lawyers on Facebook See Michael Carabash's LinkedIn Profile

Archives

  • March 2010 (25)
  • February 2010 (29)
  • January 2010 (27)
  • December 2009 (21)
  • October 2009 (49)
  • September 2009 (48)
  • August 2009 (27)
  • July 2009 (25)
  • June 2009 (32)
  • May 2009 (53)
  • April 2009 (55)
  • March 2009 (83)
  • February 2009 (39)

Categories

  • Access to Justice (77)
  • Bankruptcy/Insolvency (5)
  • Business Law (70)
  • Canada Income Tax (13)
  • Charity/Not-For-Profit (7)
  • Civil Litigation (14)
  • Criminal Law (23)
  • Employment (1)
  • Family Law (33)
  • History of DL (119)
  • Immigration (1)
  • Intellectual Property (4)
  • Lawyers & Technology (68)
  • Marketing & Promotion (57)
  • Negotiations (3)
  • Personal Injury (12)
  • Real Estate (36)
  • Sole Practitioner (14)
  • Wills and Estates (29)

Michael Carabash on Twitter

    follow me on Twitter

    Terms of Use

    The content on the DL Blog is provided for educational and informational purposes only. It is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should not rely upon or act on information in this blog without seeking legal advice (e.g. by making a post on Dynamic Lawyers) as to any matters of specific concern to them. Dynamic Lawyers Ltd. is not responsible for and does not necessarily agree with the contents of comments posted by readers of the DL Blog. Such comments represent the personal views of the commenters only and are included on this blog in the interest of promoting public discourse and a free exchange of ideas. Dynamic Lawyers Ltd. reserves the right to delete any comment posted on this site which we, in our sole and absolute discretion, deem inappropriate for publication on this site.

    FREE Legal Resources!

    FREE Legal Guides

    Legal Line

    Advice Scene

    Duhaime

    Canlii

    Continuing Legal Education Ontario

    JD Supra

    Legal Tree

    IsThatLegal

    Finalist: Legal Culture Award

    Finalist for Legal Culture Award

    Meta

    • Entries (RSS)
    • Comments (RSS)
    • WordPress
    • Log in

    © 2008-2010 Dynamic Lawyers Ltd.  All Rights Reserved.

    Family Law | Personal Injury Law | Criminal Law | Real Estate Law
    Labour and Employment Law | Business Law | Tax Law
    Wills and Estates Law | Landlord and Tenant Law
    Highway Traffic Ticket Law | Immigration Law
    Intellectual Property Law | Insurance Law