Dynamic Lawyers
Need an Ontario Lawyer?
Make a Post. Get FREE Quotes!
 
Call: (647) 680-9530
 
Home
Home
Sign in
Sign in
Make a Post
Make a Post
DL Blog
DL Blog
About Us
About Us
About Us
FREE Checkup
Terms of Use
Terms of Use
Help
Help
Privacy Policy
Privacy Policy
Disclaimer
Disclaimer
Contact Us
Contact Us
  • Home
  • About Michael Carabash
  • Disclaimer
Sep 02

Limited Partnerships (Part 18): Forming the Ontario LP using an extra-provincial entity

Business Law Comments Off

Michael CarabashOntario Limited Partnership Formation

Please note that the information provided herein is not legal advice and is provided for informational and educational purposes only. If you need legal advice with respect to drafting, reviewing, interpreting or resolving disputes concerning partnership and limited partnership agreements, you should seek professional assistance (e.g. make a post on Dynamic Lawyers). We have Toronto, Ottawa, Hamilton, Mississauga, Brampton, and other Ontario business lawyers registered on the website who can answer your questions or help you with your partnership and limited partnership agreements. I should know – I’m one of them and you can contact me directly.

The New Delaware LLC (or Alternative for Investing)?
I honestly believe that Ontario Limited Partnerships will become the next type of Delaware Limited Liability Company.  Why?  Because those companies are being subject to more stringent tax reporting requirements.  Ontario Limited Partnerships are similar to Delaware LLCs in many respects.  First, the limited partners are liable for the partnership’s debts only up to their contribution or amount promised (akin to a corporation).  Second, the limited partnership is a flow through entity, so no taxes are paid at the limited partnership level  (akin to a partnership).  Ontario Limited Partnerships have the best of both words – corporation and partnership.  So long as you’re mindful of partnership laws, tax laws, securities laws and the like, you’ll be flying straight with your Limited Partnership.

Forming the Limited Partnership using  an extra-provincial corporation
OK, so you are not located in Ontario or even Canada, but you want to have an Ontario Limited Partnership to do business through. That’s perfectly OK for the purposes of Ontario law.  Now, remember: an Ontario LP is comprised of at least one general partner (typically a corporation, because the general partner is exposed to unlimited liability) and at least one limited partner (e.g. an individual, corporation, partnership, etc.).

So you have an extra-provincial corporation.  What next?  Well, if you want it to be the Ontario general partner, you need to obtain an extra-provincial license for the corporate partner.  There is a fee ($330) that has to be paid, paperwork that has to be filed, and an agent for service appointed in order to receive service on behalf of the extra provincial corporation.  I’ve previously blogged about this process here.  You can contact me directly if you need help doing this. Once you’ve got your extra-provincial license, you can now proceed to register the limited partnership using the extra-provincial corporation as a general partner.  THIS IS PERFECTLY OK.  This would not, however, be considered an extra-provincial limited partnership.  An extra-provincial limited partnership is a partnership that is already registered and organized in some other jurisdiction.

What about an extra-provincial LLC as the general partner?
I have spoken with government staff on a number of occasions and they have confirmed that an extra-provincial Limited Liability Company (i.e. not formed in Ontario or even Canada) CAN be the GENERAL PARTNER of an Ontario limited partnership.  So what’s an LLC?  A typical LLC is a hybrid entity: part partnership, part corporation.  It takes the best and worse of both worlds.  As a partnership, it can be disregarded for tax purposes.  This means it’s a flow through entity (just like an Ontario limited partnership).  So the members (not shareholders) who own the units of the LLC receive the profits and losses and are taxed accordingly.  This differs from a corporation, where the corporation is a separate legal entity (it gets taxed) and then the shareholders receive dividends (they get taxed again!).  So, as a partnership-like structure, it has tax advantages. But it also conveys limited liability status on its members and managers.  SWEET!

So how does an LLC become the general partner of an Ontario limited partnership?  Well, we look at the definition of a general partner under the Limited Partnerships Act. Section 2(2) of the Act says that “a limited partnership shall consist of one or more persons who are general partners…”.  OK, so a “person” can be a general partner.  So who’s a person, then? Turning to section 1(1) of the Act, we see that “person” includes an individual, sole proprietorship, partnership, unincorporated association, unincorporated syndicate, unincorporated organization, trust, body corporate, and a natural person in his or her capacity as trustee, executor, administrator or other legal representative.  Hmmm…so does an LLC count as a “person”?  It has traits for both a partnership and a corporation.  It is also not incorporated.  I think it would fit within the definition of an “unincorporated organization” under section 1(1).  So I would argue that an extra-provincial LLC is capable of being the general partner for an Ontario Limited Partnership.

Before you can register your Ontario Limited Partnership, you’ll need to register the extra-provincial LLC: you fill out Form 6 and pay $80 to register the business name under the Business Names Act.  The registration lasts for 5 years, so be sure to renew it!  Also, if your name is inappropriate (e.g. includes certain words that identify it as being government) or confusing similar to a competitor’s name in the industry (particularly one that has a trademark), then you may run into problems trying to register or keep the name.  You might want to do a NUANS name search before submitting the registration to avoid wasting extra time and money if the name is inappropriate or confusingly similar to an already existing name.

  • Share/Bookmark

written by admin \\ tags: forming an Ontario limited partnership, limited liability company, limited partnership, limited partnership agreement, llc, lp, ontario limited partnership

Sep 01

Ontario Limited Partnerships (Part 17): Foreign Persons creating an Ontario LP

Business Law Comments Off

Michael CarabashPlease note that the information provided herein is not legal advice and is provided for informational and educational purposes only. If you need legal advice with respect to drafting, reviewing, interpreting or resolving disputes concerning partnership and limited partnership agreements, you should seek professional assistance (e.g. make a post on Dynamic Lawyers). We have Toronto, Ottawa, Hamilton, Mississauga, Brampton, and other Ontario business lawyers registered on the website who can answer your questions or help you with your partnership and limited partnership agreements. I should know – I’m one of them and you can contact me directly.

I thought I would blog about certain nuances when it comes to limited partnerships formed by extra-provincial persons.  These are often referred to as extra-provincial limited partnerships, but I don’t think this is always the case (as discussed below).  But before we get into this discussion, lets start off with the basics, shall we?

What is an Extra-Provincial Limited Partnership?
An Extra-Provincial Limited Partnership is a few things.  First, it is a general partnership that is already is in existence.  A general partnership is the relationship that exists between two or more parties doing business in common with a view to making profit.  So, just to recap, if two individuals living in Mexico or the U.S. wanted to form an Ontario limited partnership, they would first have to have a general partnership between themselves.  Remember: an Ontario limited partnership is simply a designation granted by the Ontario statute.  Now, after being organized as a general partnership, it becomes a limited partnership – just not in Ontario.  A general partnership in Ontario becomes a limited partnership by filing and being issued a Form 3 Declaration from the Ontario government.  So the idea is that Ontario is willing to recognize limited partnerships from other jurisdictions.  That recognition is done when the Limited Partnership files a Declaration Form 3.

Now it’s important to note that I’ve generally come across two situations that involve limited partnerships formed by foreign entities: (1) a limited partnership organized outside of Ontario wishes to do business in Ontario and (2) extra-provincial persons wish to create and use an Ontario limited partnership as a legal structure but do not wish to do business in Ontario.  For the purposes of this blog, I’ll be discussing the second scenario.

What’s so special about the second scenario?  Well, it’s interesting because it is not the case that a limited partnership is formed outside of Ontario and which simply needs to register as an extra-provincial limited partnership.  The reality is that the limited partnership is being formed in ONTARIO under the Limited Partnerships Act, but it is done so by persons who are not resident or doing business in Ontario.  This can get a big confusing: it’s not an extra-provincial limited partnership, it’s just a plain old regular Ontario limited partnership.  The only difference is who is forming it.  So, just to recap, I’m going to be talking about how foreign persons (i.e. an extra-provincial corporation, such as a U.S. or Mexican company) can form an Ontario limited partnership.

Extra-Provincial License for the Corporation
OK, so here’s the situation.  A corporation is set up to be the general partner.  Lets assume, for simplicity’s sake, that this corporation is not an Ontario or even Canadian corporation (if it is, then there would need to be compliance with Ontario or Canadian corporate, tax, and securities laws with respect to that corporation).  For their part, limited partners are ready to partner up with the general partner.  How does it all fit together such that they form an “Ontario Limited Partnership”?

Well, the Ontario government will only allow an extra-provincial corporation to be a general partner if it has obtained a license under the Extra-Provincial Corporations Act.   Even if it’s not doing business in Ontario, the government here wants to know who this extra-provincial corporation is.   So they’ll want to see (among other things) information about the corporate name, head office, jurisdiction which it is created and subject to, its proposed business in Ontario, etc. They will also need to see how is the Agent for Service in Ontario.  The idea is that someone over 18 years old who is resident in Ontario or a corporation with a head office in Ontario must act as the Agent for Service of the extra-provincial corporation for the purpose of receiving service of process, notices, or other proceedings (so that service on the Agent is deemed to be service on the extra provincial corporation).  In certain situations, the Ontario government will also want an ORIGINAL Certificate of Status issued under the seal of the incorporating jurisdiction, signed by the proper person, and showing:

  1. The name of the corporation;
  2. The date of incorporation;
  3. The jurisdiction to which the corporation is subject; and
  4. That the corporation is valid and existing.

Some jurisdictions (e.g. Netherlands) do not provide these kinds of certificates, but the Ontario government still allow corporations from these jurisdictions to be registered.  Finally, the Ontario government will want to see an original NUANS name search report to make sure that there is no conflicting or confusingly similar name of the corporation which is currently in existence.  It generally takes about 3 weeks for the paperwork to be processed once the Ontario government has received it.   There are also government fees (i.e. $330) which must be paid to obtain this extra-provincial corporate license.

Registering the Limited Partnership
Now that you’ve got your extra-provincial corporate license in hand for the general partner, it’s time to register the Limited Partnership.  Now, as I said above, in the situation I’m describing, the limited partnership has not been formed elsewhere; there is no other organizing statute; so there is no extra-provincial limited partnership.  All that’s happening is the formation of a plain and simply limited partnership in Ontario by a general partner who is not a resident in Ontario (it’s a corporation formed outside of Ontario but with a license to conduct business here).  And, to simplify matters, I’m also assuming that the limited partnership is not doing business in Ontario.  So you fill out the Declaration Form 3 and pay the $220 government filing fee.  Once registered, you will need to file a renewal every 5 years.  Note: the Ontario government will not send notices out, so you better just keep your eye on the date when the limited partnership must be renewed!

Now, I’ve personally gotten into some debates with government staff as to how to go about filling out this declaration for the situation I’ve described.  I’ve spoken with managers in the government office because they seem to believe that the form should be filled out in a certain way.  I would strongly urge you to contact me to deal directly with government staff to prevent delays with respect to registering the LP.  They may not understand the intricacies of the Limited Partnerships Act and may simply demand documentation which is not needed.  It’s quite easy to make mistakes, given that the laws concerning limited partnerships are not always clear.

Carrying on the business of the partnership
Now that the limited partnership has been established, business can be conducted.  As I’ve previously blogged about, in Ontario, the limited partnership is not a legal entity capable of holding or dealing with limited partnership property.  Rather, it is the general partnership, which has been entrusted with managing the affairs of the limited partnership, which does so on its behalf.

Taxes!
So finally, we come to the issue of taxes.  In Canada, a Ontario limited partnership is not a separate legal entity (unlike a corporation) or a”person”.  I have previously blogged about this here.  As such, they are not considered to be taxpayers (i.e. who are, indeed, “persons”) under the Canada Income Tax Act.  Rather, partnership income, losses, assets, and liabilities are all attributable to the partners as per the limited partnership agreement. As per the Canada Income Tax Act, partnerships do not file separate tax returns. They file annual “information returns” setting out their income and details of the partners who are entitled to that income. It is the partners who are required to pay income tax. The limited partnership is simply a flow-through entity.

So to recap: the net income of the partners (for income tax purposes) of a limited partnership is determined by figuring out the net income of the limited partnership.  To figure out the net income of the limited partnership, the Act says that you look at it as if it were a separate legal person: s. 96(1)(a). So you include income and deduct allowable expenses and other credits. Then, the limited partnership’s income will be attributed to the partners (usually as per the limited partnership agreement). Each partner must report their income or losses from the partnership and pay taxes accordingly: s. 96(1)(f).

Now, if the partners (e.g. extra provincial general partner and the limited partners) of the limited partnership are resident of some country other than Canada, the issue comes up as to whether any tax is owing in Canada.  Generally, under the Income Tax Act, RESIDENTS of Canada at any time in the year are required to pay tax on their worldwide income: section 2(1).  Now, if an individual is a non-resident, then they may still have to pay Canadian income tax if they received certain kinds of income from Canadian sources – such as employment income, business income, or income derived from the sale of taxable Canadian property.  Now this stuff is somewhat complicated and long-winded, so I think I’ll dedicate another blog to the topic of taxation of partners of a limited partnership if they are resident or non-resident in Canada.

  • Share/Bookmark

written by admin \\ tags: Civil Litigation, legal person, legal situations, limited partners, limited partnership agreement, limited partnership agreements, limited partnerships, ontario business, ontario limited, partner status, partnerships act, professional assistance, separate legal entity, tax purposes, taxation of limited partnerships ontario

Aug 31

Ontario LP Agreement (Part 16): Terms and Conditions of the Limited Partnership Agreement (Continued)…

Business Law Comments Off

Ontario Limited Partnership Agreement Lawyer: Terms and Conditions

Please keep in mind that this is not legal advice. The information provided herein is for educational purposes only. If you would like to get in touch with a lawyer to help you draft, interpret, negotiate or resolve a dispute about an Ontario limited partnership agreement, then you are encouraged to seek a professional (e.g. make a post on Dynamic Lawyers). We have Ontario lawyers who can assist you in this regard (I would know, I’m one of them!). If you want to get in touch with me directly, feel free to email me directly to discuss all your limited partnership agreement needs! If you’d like to buy a text link on this blog post, you can contact me directly.

This is the third of a series of blog posts I’m writing about the terms typically found in a limited partnership agreement. In my first blog, I talked about the Introductory Clause, the Definitions and Interpretation, and the Name of the Limited Partnership. In my second blog, I discussed the Term, Place and Description of Business, and Status of the General Partner.  In this blog, I’ll be discussing the Status of a Limited Partner, Capital Contributions, and Division of Net Profits.  Again, if you need help in this regard, give me a shout!

Status of Limited Partner
Now, I’ve blogged extensively about what it means to be a limited partner.  Essentially, you are a passive investor.  You have certain rights under the Limited Partnerships Act and your liability is generally limited to your contribution to the partnership.  There are exceptions to having limited liability.  These exceptions include having your surname (if you’re an individual) or a distinctive part of your corporate name (if you’re a corporation) form part of the name of the Limited Partnership (see section 6(1) of the Limited Partnerships Act).  If this is the case, then the limited partner could be as liable as a general partner (i.e. unlimited liability for the limited partnership’s debts and obligations!).  Another exception is when the limited partner take part in controlling the business of the corporation (see section 13(1) of the Act).  When this happens, the limited liability protection is also lost.  So, although these things are covered in the Limited Partnerships Act, it may be worthwhile to repeat them in the agreement itself.

Capital Contributions
If you don’t have an agreement, all of the limited partners will have to contribute equal amounts of capital to the limited partnership.  This is just the function of all partners being equal under the Partnerships Act.  This can be modified, however, through a limited partnership agreement.  In this regard, you’ll want to specify the amount or percentage and date of initial capital contributions which each limited partner will be making. “Capital” means the sums contributed by the partners for the purpose of commencing or carrying on the partnership business and is intended to be risked by the partners in that business.  When a partner contributes capital to a partnership, that capital becomes the property of the partnership.  The individual partner loses their property interest in the asset they contributed as capital (be it money or property – but NOT services) and gains an ownership interest in the property of the partnership as a whole.   That’s why section 7(2) of the Limited Partnerships Act says that a limited partner’s in the limited partnership is PERSONAL property (even if they contributed REAL property such as land or buildings).

An important question which may come up is whether capital contributions will be required – for example at some date or event in the future or on a regular basis.  In order for a limited partnership to be exempt from registering or issuing a prospectus under Ontario securities laws, it must impose regular capital contributions on its membership for financing purposes (this is one of many requirements to qualify as a private investment club).

One way or another, the capital contribution of the limited partners should be documented in a schedule that includes the following information:

  • Date
  • Name of individual or corporation
  • Address of individual or corporation
  • Capital Contribution in Canadian dollars
  • Percentage Interest received

In exchange for contributing capital and signing the limited partnership agreement, each limited partner should also sign a Subscription Agreement which explains more of the rights and responsibilities of the limited partner, as well as outlining any securities exemptions which the limited partnership is seeking to rely upon.

Division of Net Profits
Under Section 11(1) of the Limited Partnerships Act, a limited partner has the right (subject to the Act) to a share of profits and to have their contribution returned.  If there is no agreement, each limited partner will be entitled to profit in proportion to their actual contributions.  Worth mentioning however, is that, under section 11(2) of the Act profits may not be paid out as income to limited partners if doing so would reduce the limited partnership’s assets to the extent that it would be insufficient to discharge its liabilities to third parties (i.e. parties who are not general or limited partners).

In another blog, I’ll continue my discussion of the terms found in a typical limited partnership agreement.

  • Share/Bookmark

written by admin \\ tags: limited partnership, limited partnership agreement, limited partnership contract ontario, limited partnership terms, limited partnership terms and conditions, ontario limited partnership, ontario limited partnerships agreement, toronto partnerships lawyer

Aug 31

Failing to Use Corporate Name on Contracts, Invoices, Orders for Goods and Services, etc.

Business Law Comments Off

Personal Liability for failing to use Company Name

Please keep in mind that this is not legal advice. The information provided herein is for educational purposes only. If you would like to get in touch with a lawyer to help you draft, interpret, negotiate or resolve a dispute about a party’s failure to use the company name on invoices and contracts in Ontario, then you are encouraged to seek a professional (e.g. make a post on Dynamic Lawyers). We have Ontario lawyers who can assist you in this regard.  If you’d like to buy a text link on this blog post, you can contact me directly.

So the running theme for today (because I’ve answered this question twice now for different clients) is: what happens if I don’t write my company’s name on invoices and contracts?  Could I be held personally liable for breaches of those contracts or invoices?

Now the typical situation is you have a company called 123456 Ontario Inc. but you want to carry on business under a different name, such as ACME Enterprises.  So in this situation, you have a boring numbered company (123456 Ontario Inc.) and you want to go out into the marketplace with a jazzy name (ACME Enterprises).  Well, assuming you can use the jazzy name without violating trademarks, then you would need to REGISTER that name as a TRADE NAME under the Business Names Act.  Why bother?  Well, you still want to take advantage of having limited liability as a shareholder, director, and officer of the company, don’t you?  Well then you need to register a TRADE NAME and then use both the TRADE NAME and the company’s name on invoices and contracts.  You could write something like “[Company Name] carrying on business as [Trade Name]” or “[Company Name] c/o/b/ [Trade Name]“.  The purpose of doing this is to signify to third parties that you are operating as a corporation and that they are dealing with a corporation instead of some other entity, like a sole proprietorship.  It’s all about disclosure.  Now, let’s get into what happens if you fail to do so…

We’ll start off with what the legislation says.

Business Names Act
Section 2(1) of the Business Names Act says that “No corporation shall carry on business or identify itself to the public under a name other than its corporate name unless the name is registered by that corporation.” OK, that’s a good start.  So there’s a prohibition.  And there’s a punishment if you fail to do so: under section 10 of the Act, everyone who contravenes section 2 without reasonable cause is guilty of an offence and on conviction is liable to a fine of not more than $2,000 or, if the person is a corporation, to a fine of not more than $25,000.  OUCH!

OK, so what else is there?

Well, section 2(6) of the Act goes on to say that “A corporation and such other persons as are prescribed carrying on business under a registered name or, in the case of a corporation, identifying itself to the public under a registered name, shall set out both the registered name and the person’s name in all contracts, invoices, negotiable instruments and orders involving goods or services issued or made by the person.”  OK, we’ve got a requirement!  That requirement is for a corporation and other persons carrying on business under a REGISTERED NAME must set out both the corporate and registered name. Again, violating this section could lead to you being prosecuted by the government and being fined as per section 10 above.

Caselaw
So outside of what the legislation says (and government prosecutions for failing to register), what other consequences do you face?  Could you face personal liability in a private lawsuit for breaching a contract which you believed your company (and not you) had entered into?  YOU BETTER BELIEVE IT! This is where the courts come into play.

In City Press Inc. v. Green (c.o.b. B & G Print & Litho), [1996] O.J. No. 1823, the Divisional Court held that the principal of a corporation was PERSONALLY liable for over $19,000 for failing to disclose that a third party was dealing with his corporation and not him personally.  In coming to that conclusion, the Court reviewed the caselaw concerning failing to identify your company in dealings (e.g. contracts and invoices) with third parties.  Here’s what the Court had to say:

14 It would appear that one of the purposes of s. 2.(6) of the Business Names Act is to protect the public, and as a consequence if someone expects to take advantage of the limited liability available to him through the process of incorporation, he should make the public aware of the existence of such corporation in his dealings with other members of the public. This was one of the factors taken into consideration by the Court in imposing personal liability on the Defendant in Short’s Backhoe and Trucking Ltd. v. Noseworthy (1992) 101 Nfld. & P.E.I. Reports, p. 277.

15 It was noted in Excelco Foods Inc. v. Snider (1991) 95 Sask. R. p. 314 (Sask. Q.B.) p. 316 that if an individual wishes to escape personal liability on a contract, such a person has a duty to make it clear to the person with whom he is contracting that he is negotiating on behalf of his corporation and not in his personal capacity. In that case, the Court imposed personal liability on the Defendant who used the name of his business Candy Connection which was known to the plaintiff but tried to argue that his company Candy Connection Inc. should be liable. It should be noted that in that case, none of the invoices made reference to the Corporation as is the case in the matter before me.

16 Similarly in the case of Interlake Packers Ltd. v. Vogt and Loewen (1987) 47 Man. R. (2d) p. 268 (Man. Q.B.) the defendant was held to be personally liable for meat products sold and delivered by the plaintiff instead of his company E.V. Wholesale Meats Limited, because invoices were made out to E & V Meat Whls. and other similar names without the corporate entity being referred to.

17 The same finding was made in the case of W.R. Benjamin Products Ltd. v. Saulnier (1982) 40 N.B.R. (2d) 537 (N.B., Q.B.) where the Court indicated at p. 539:

“There is no clear evidence to satisfy me that the Plaintiff was ever made aware of the incorporation of the Defendant’s business or that it was doing business with a corporation. And that, in my opinion, is the determining factor.”

18 Similar conclusions were arrived at in the Ontario case of Victor (Can.) Ltd. v. Far Better Addressing and Mailing Ltd. et al (1978) 3 B.L.R. p. 312 (Ont. H.C.J.) by Morin J. who indicated that the Plaintiff would fully expect that it was dealing with an unincorporated business with “S” as owner and operator and personally liable to the Plaintiff upon the failure of “S” to indicate otherwise and in the British Columbia case of West Fraser Builder Supplies v. Vanderhorst [1990] B.C.W.L.D. 436 (B.C.C.A.).

Other and more recent Ontario cases have confirmed this decision.  Most notably, in Truster v. Tri-Lux Homes Ltd. [1998] O.J. No. 2001, the Ontario Court of Appeal provided a two part analysis in determining the issue of liability when the existence of a corporation is not revealed at the time of making the contract.  That two-part analysis is summarized as follows:

  1. Did the individuals hold themselves as individuals or as an agent of a corporation and if so, did the individuals do it to a degree that attracted personal liability?
  2. Is there sufficient evidence to indicate that, prior to closing, the other party to the transaction elected to look ONLY to the corporation to carry out the agreement once it became aware of the existence of the corporation?  If not, then the individual may attract personal liability.

In Truster, the Court of Appeal said the following while talking about persons wishing to benefit from the protection of the corporate veil:

“They should identify the name of the company with which they are associated in a reasonable manner or risk being found personally liable if the circumstances warrant it: see cases such as Watfield International Enterprises Inc. v. 655293 Ontario Ltd., [1995] O.J. No. 1146, (1995), 21 B.L.R. (2d) 158 (Ont. Ct. (Gen. Div.)) and Pennelly Ltd. v. 449483 Ontario Ltd., [1986] O.J. No. 2672, (1986), 20 C.L.R. 145 (Ont. H.C.J.).”

The Court of Appeal noted that:

“This principle properly flows from the fact that incorporation provides corporate officers and shareholders a legal protection thought to be necessary for modern business relations; however, if one expects to benefit from this protection, then others must, at minimum, be informed in a reasonable manner, that they are dealing with a corporation and not an individual. In the last analysis, persons who set up after the fact that they contracted solely on behalf of another bear the onus of establishing that the party with whom they were dealing was aware of the capacity in which they acted: Clow Darling Ltd. v. 1013983 Ontario Inc., [1997] O.J. No. 3655 (Gen. Div.); Nord Ovest Spa v. Gruppo Giorgio Ltd., [1994] O.J. No. 1657 (Gen. Div.).”

Finally, the Court of Appeal said that, once a party becomes aware that a corporation may be involved, there must also be evidence of an intention on the part of that party to relieve the other party of its personal liability.  If there is no such intention, then the individual may be personally liable for the alleged obligations of the corporation.

SO, in a nutshell, failing to property identify your corporation in invoices and contracts could lead to prosecution under the Business Names Act or private lawsuits against YOU PERSONALLY (and not just your corporation).  If the lawsuit is against you personally, then you expose your personal assets in the event that you are liable to pay!  OUCH!  Better keep the corporate name on everything in that case!

  • Share/Bookmark

written by admin \\ tags: business name, business names act, corporate name, peircing the corporate veil, registering a trade name, trade name, tradename

Aug 31

Ontario LP Agreement (Part 15): Terms and Conditions of the Limited Partnership Agreement (Continued)…

Business Law Comments Off

Ontario Limited Partnership Agreement Lawyer: Terms and Conditions

Please keep in mind that this is not legal advice. The information provided herein is for educational purposes only. If you would like to get in touch with a lawyer to help you draft, interpret, negotiate or resolve a dispute about an Ontario limited partnership agreement, then you are encouraged to seek a professional (e.g. make a post on Dynamic Lawyers). We have Ontario lawyers who can assist you in this regard (I would know, I’m one of them!). If you want to get in touch with me directly, feel free to email me directly to discuss all your limited partnership agreement needs! If you’d like to buy a text link on this blog post, you can contact me directly.

This is the second of a series of blog posts I’m writing about the terms typically found in a limited partnership agreement.  In my first blog, I talked about the Introductory Clause, the Definitions and Interpretation, and the Name of the Limited Partnership.  I’m going to continue my analysis by discussing the Term, Place and Description of Business, and Status of the General Partner in this blog.  Again, if you need help in this regard, give me a shout!

Term of the Partnership
The Term has to deal with when the Limited Partnership is formed (i.e. upon the filing and receipt of the Form 3 Declaration under the Limited Partnerships Act) and how long it will survive for.  Now, worth noting is that a Limited Partnership is, first and foremost, a partnership.  This means that it is also governed by the Partnerships Act (so long as there is no conflict with the Limited Partnerships Act).  Now, under section 26(1) of the Partnerships Act and at common law (i.e. judge made law), a partnership is considered to be a “partnership at will” unless some agreement to the contrary can be proved.  “At will” means that the term of the partnership is determined at the will of the partners.  So if a partner wishes to end the partnership, then they can do so by giving notice to all of the other partners of their intention to terminate.  Section 26(1) has been interpreted in Patridge v. Seguin, [1991] O.J. No. 1355 to mean that, where the partnership agreement is silent as to the duration of the partnership, any partner may unilaterally terminate the partnership by giving notice.  If, however, the partnership agreement provides for the termination of the partnership, then this section will not apply.  As such, this section is subject to any agreement between the partners.  So, to recap, if the partnership agreement specifies some manner in which to terminate the partnership (e.g. by mutual agreement, through a shotgun buy-sell provision, etc.), then that will mean that the partnership is not “at will” (i.e. cannot be terminated under section 26(1)) and the partnership agreement must be complied with in order to terminate the partnership.

Place and Description of Business
An Ontario limited partnership needs to have some place to hold its partnership records.  Those records can be inspected by limited partners pursuant to rights afforded to them under the Limited Partnerships Act.  The government also needs to know where to send service of documents.  For these reasons, you should identify the principal place of business or head office of the Limited Partnership in the agreement (you’ll need to do so anyways in the Form 3 Declaration).

When it comes to describing the business affairs of the Limited Partnership, it all comes down to disclosure and authorization.  Here, the Limited Partnership is disclosing its line of business (e.g. buying, trading, and holding securities and real estate).  It is also authorizing its general partner to do those things which are necessary to give effect to its business activities.  Perhaps the scope of authority of one or more general partners will be limited here?  Perhaps the business of the limited partnership will not be able to change unless the limited partners consent (e.g. through a special 2/3 vote)?  The idea is that the business of the partnership will be tailored to the specific needs and requirements of the general and limited partners.  Some may want a narrow definition, while others may want it very broad.  At the end, it will come down to what the parties want.

Status of the General Partner
Here, following up on the activities and business of the limited partnership, you’ll want to state that the General Partner is in charge of the limited partnership’s activities (and / or any limitation on those powers).  You could, if you wanted to, state that the General Partner has unlimited liability (as per the Limited Partnerships Act).  But you also want to state here what the General Partner is – typically a corporation incorporated under the province of [x].  You’ll also want the General Partner to indicate that it has all the necessary powers, approvals, and authorizations to act as the General Partner for the limited partnership and will not be in any conflict with internal or external documents or agreements as a result.

In another blog, I’ll continue my discussion of the terms found in a typical limited partnership agreement.

  • Share/Bookmark

written by admin \\ tags: limited partnership, limited partnership agreement, limited partnership contract ontario, limited partnership terms, limited partnership terms and conditions, ontario limited partnership, ontario limited partnerships agreement, toronto partnerships lawyer

Aug 30

Limited Partnership Agreement Lawyer (Part 14): Terms and Conditions of the LP Agreement…

Business Law Comments Off

Ontario Limited Partnership Agreement Lawyer: Terms and Conditions

Please keep in mind that this is not legal advice. The information provided herein is for educational purposes only. If you would like to get in touch with a lawyer to help you draft, interpret, negotiate or resolve a dispute about an Ontario limited partnership agreement, then you are encouraged to seek a professional (e.g. make a post on Dynamic Lawyers). We have Ontario lawyers who can assist you in this regard (I would know, I’m one of them!). If you want to get in touch with me directly, feel free to email me directly to discuss all your limited partnership agreement needs!  If you’d like to buy a text link on this blog post, you can contact me directly.

So in this blog and the next few ones, I’ll be talking about some of the standard terms you can find a typical Limited Partnership Agreement.   Again, if you need help in this regard, give me a shout!

Introductory Clause
This is the first clause in a Limited Partnership Agreement.  It will include the date, the parties, and an indication that the agreement is a Limited Partnership Agreement.  When I see things like “On the First Part”, “On the Second Party”, etc., I ask myself: “Why is this here?  What purpose does it serve?”  I don’t believe it’s helpful to include confusing and archaic language so I remove it.  Worth mentioning is that the parties can be corporations; indeed, it is generally preferable and commonplace to see the General Partner (which has unlimited liability) as a corporation.  The individuals who are the limited partners must be at least 18 years old.  Remember: for a limited partnership to exist, there must be at least one general partner and one limited partner.

Recitals
This is where you can provide some information about the background and context for which the parties are entering into the agreement.

Organizing the Body of the Agreement
The body of the Agreement is typically broken down into Articles (main headings) and Sections (sub headings).  I like to use the following breakdown: Article I – Definition and Interpretation, Article II – The Limited Partnership, Article III – Management of the Limited Partnership, etc.  And within each article, I use Sections such as 1.01. Definitions, 1.02.  Interpretation, etc. So lets dive into some of these Articles and Sections, shall we?

Definitions
Here, you can define terms used throughout the Agreement for ease of reference.  Things like “Act” refer to the “Limited Partnerships Act“.  The “Agreement” means the Limited Partnership Agreement, as amended, and Scheduled attached to it.  “Business Day” means this and “Fiscal Year” means that.  You get the point.  PLEASE PLEASE be sure not to include terms that are not used in the Agreement.  I see this all the time.  It takes up space and adds nothing.

Interpretation
This part includes some pretty standard stuff about how the contract will be interpreted.  For example, singular words can become plural, depending on the context.  Same goes for masculine vs. feminine.  There will also be a provision that states that Article and Section headings do not form part of the agreement for interpretation purposes, but are for convenience only.

The Name of the Partnership
There are a few things worth mentioning when it comes to the name of the limited partnership.  First, you might want to consider doing a name search to see if the name is already in use by a business in the same or similar industry (which could cause confusion).  If no such name exists, then the partners might want to consider trademarking it.   Remember: if the surname or distinctive part of a corporate name of a limited partner is included in the limited partnership’s name, then that limited partner may be liable as a general partner: section 6(1) of the Limited Partnerships Act.

In the next blog, I’ll continue my discussion of the terms found in a typical limited partnership agreement.

  • Share/Bookmark

written by admin \\ tags: limited partnership, limited partnership agreement, ontario limited partner, ontario limited partnership agreement

Aug 28

Settlement and Release Agreement – Mutual (Ontario): FREE DL Guide

Business Law Comments Off

Toronto business lawyerSettlement and Release Agreement (mutual)

This is the full and FREE DL Guide that comes with every purchase of a Settlement and Release Agreement (mutual) on Dynamic Lawyers:

When you purchase an Ontario Mutual Settlement and Release Agreement from Dynamic Lawyers, you get a lawyer-prepared and customizable legal form, a VIDEO TUTORIAL showing you how to customize the legal form, the DL GUIDE (above), plus another DL GUDE (entitled “Is My Legal Form Valid and Enforceable?”) – all for a very low price of just $47 plus taxes! It would cost you thousands of dollars for a lawyer to prepare all of these things for you from scratch! So what are you waiting for? Get your package today!

  • Share/Bookmark

written by admin \\ tags: mutual release agreement, mutual settlement and release agreement, release agreement, release agreement mutual

Aug 28

Settlement and Release Agreement – One Sided (Ontario): FREE DL Guide!

Business Law Comments Off

Toronto business lawyerSettlement and Release Agreement

This is the full and FREE DL Guide that comes with every purchase of a Settlement and Release Agreement (one sided) on Dynamic Lawyers:

When you purchase an Ontario One-Sided Settlement and Release Agreement from Dynamic Lawyers, you get a lawyer-prepared and customizable legal form, a VIDEO TUTORIAL showing you how to customize the legal form, the DL GUIDE (above), plus another DL GUDE (entitled “Is My Legal Form Valid and Enforceable?”) – all for a very low price of just $47 plus taxes! It would cost you thousands of dollars for a lawyer to prepare all of these things for you from scratch! So what are you waiting for? Get your package today!

  • Share/Bookmark

written by admin \\ tags: one sided settlement and release agreement, settlement agreement, settlement template, sttlement and release agreement

Aug 28

Independent Contractor Agreement | Contractor Template (Ontario): FREE DL Guide!

Business Law Comments Off

Toronto business lawyerIndependent Contractor Contract | Agreement

This is the full and FREE DL Guide that comes with every purchase of an Independent Contractor Agreement on Dynamic Lawyers:

When you purchase an Ontario Independent Contractor Agreement from Dynamic Lawyers, you get a lawyer-prepared and customizable legal form, a VIDEO TUTORIAL showing you how to customize the legal form, the DL GUIDE (above), plus another DL GUDE (entitled “Is My Legal Form Valid and Enforceable?”) – all for a very low price of just $97 plus taxes! It would cost you thousands of dollars for a lawyer to prepare all of these things for you from scratch! So what are you waiting for? Get your package today!

  • Share/Bookmark

written by admin \\ tags: contractor agreement, contractor agreement sample, contractor template, independent agreement, independent contractor agreement

Aug 28

Non Compete | No Competition Agreement (Ontario): FREE DL Guide!

Business Law No Comments »

Toronto business lawyerNon Compete | No Competition Agreement

This is the full and FREE DL Guide that comes with every purchase of an Non Compete Agreement on Dynamic Lawyers:

When you purchase an Ontario Non-Competition Agreement from Dynamic Lawyers, you get a lawyer-prepared and customizable legal form, a VIDEO TUTORIAL showing you how to customize the legal form, the DL GUIDE (above), plus another DL GUDE (entitled “Is My Legal Form Valid and Enforceable?”) – all for a very low price of just $27 plus taxes! It would cost you thousands of dollars for a lawyer to prepare all of these things for you from scratch! So what are you waiting for? Get your package today!

  • Share/Bookmark

written by admin \\ tags: no compete contract, no compete ontario, no competition clause, non compete agreement, non competition agreement ontario

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12   Next Page »

Search

Latest Public Posts:

  • Property Tax in Previ...
  • Testamentary trust...
  • Land Lord denying me ...
  • Childs Rights...
  • Corporation moving to...
  • Enforcment of summary...
  • Common Law Question...
  • My Partner's spouse h...
  • Common law...
  • slip and fell...

Need a Lawyer?

    Toronto Business Lawyer

    Toronto Wills and Estates Lawyer

FREE Legal Stuff:

    Free Legal Health Checkup

    Free Legal Guides

As Featured In...

    Dynamic Lawyers in the News

Report: Toronto Lawyer Fees

    End of the Billable Hour?
    See all Stats and Reports...

eBook: Online Legal Marketing

    4 Steps to Online Legal Marketing
    See all Stats and Reports...

Boost Your Web Traffic!

    20 Free tips to boost traffic to your legal website
    See all Stats and Reports...

Business Organizations

    Business Organizations in Ontario (eBook)
    See all Stats and Reports...

Wills and Estates (eBook)

    Wills and Estates (eBook) in Ontario
    See all Stats and Reports...

Buying / Selling Real Estate

    Buying and Selling Residential Real Estate in Ontario
    See all Stats and Reports...

Limited Partnerships

    Limited Partnerships (Ontario)
    See all Stats and Reports...

Legal Forms + Video Guides

Legal Forms + Video Guides

Lawyer Prepared + Affordable!

Revocation of Will: $17
Revocation of POA: $17
Affidavits of Execution: $17
Living Will: $27
Codicil: $27
Non-Compete: $27
Non-Solicit: $27
Power of Attorney: $37
Residential Sublease: $37
Residential Lease: $47
Employment Agm't: $47
Employee Termination: $47
Confidentiality Agm't: $47
Settlement Agm't: $47
Auto-Accident Release: $47
Plaintiff's Claim: $47
Last Will: $97
Cohabitation Agm't: $97
Ind't Contractor Agm't: $97

How to Purchase:

Get the Flash Player to see this content.
Get the Flash Player to see this content.

DL in Social Media

Follow Michael Carabash on Twitter Become a Fan of Dynamic Lawyers on Facebook See Michael Carabash's LinkedIn Profile

Categories

  • Access to Justice (91)
  • Bankruptcy/Insolvency (5)
  • Business Law (117)
  • Canada Income Tax (13)
  • Charity/Not-For-Profit (8)
  • Civil Litigation (20)
  • Criminal Law (44)
  • Employment (26)
  • Family Law (52)
  • History of DL (159)
  • Immigration (1)
  • Intellectual Property (4)
  • Landlord | Tenant (13)
  • Lawyers & Technology (68)
  • Marketing & Promotion (65)
  • Negotiations (3)
  • Personal Injury (15)
  • Real Estate (37)
  • Sole Practitioner (14)
  • Wills and Estates (63)

Terms of Use

The content on the DL Blog is provided for educational and informational purposes only. It is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should not rely upon or act on information in this blog without seeking legal advice (e.g. by making a post on Dynamic Lawyers) as to any matters of specific concern to them. Dynamic Lawyers Ltd. is not responsible for and does not necessarily agree with the contents of comments posted by readers of the DL Blog. Such comments represent the personal views of the commentators only and are included on this blog in the interest of promoting public discourse and a free exchange of ideas. Dynamic Lawyers Ltd. reserves the right to delete any comment posted on this site which we, in our sole and absolute discretion, deem inappropriate for publication on this site.

FREE Legal Resources!

FREE Legal Guides

Legal Line

Advice Scene

Duhaime

Canada Legal

Canlii

Continuing Legal Education Ontario

Legal Tree

IsThatLegal

Finalist: Legal Culture Award

Finalist for Legal Culture Award

Meta

  • Entries (RSS)
  • Comments (RSS)
  • WordPress
  • Log in

© 2008-2010 Dynamic Lawyers Ltd.  All Rights Reserved.

Family Law | Personal Injury Law | Criminal Law | Real Estate Law
Labour and Employment Law | Business Law | Tax Law
Wills and Estates Law | Landlord and Tenant Law
Highway Traffic Ticket Law | Immigration Law
Intellectual Property Law | Insurance Law